{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[14,2,14,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910464435203321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Best practices in assessment of research and development organizations / / Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations, Laboratory Assessments Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, District of Columbia : , : The National Academies Press, , [2012]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2012"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-309-26627-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (90 p.)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Research - United States - Management - Evaluation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Associations, institutions, etc - Research - United States - Evaluation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"Front matter\"\"; \"\"Acknowledgement of Reviewers\"\"; \"\"Table of Contents\"\"; \"\"Summary\"\"; \"\"1  Introduction\"\"; \"\"2  Framework for Examination of Assessment Processes\"\"; \"\"3  Assessing Management\"\"; \"\"4  Assessing Technical Quality\"\"; \"\"5  Assessing Impact\"\"; \"\"6  Guidelines for Consideration During Assessment\"\"; \"\"Appendix A   Biographical Sketches of the Panel for Review of Best Practices In Research and Development Organizations\"\"; \"\"Appendix B   Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People\"\"; \"\"Appendix C   Validating the Assessment\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Appendix D   Example of Peer Advice During the Planning Phase of R&D\"\"\"\"Appendix E   Relevant Statutes and Requirements Documents for U.S. Government Laboratories and U.S. Government Research\"\"; \"\"Appendix F   The Army Research Laboratory's Process for Assuring Relevance\"\"; \"\"Appendix G   Examples of Stakeholders\"\"; \"\"Appendix H   Questions Pertaining to Assessment of Leadership and Management\"\"; \"\"Appendix I   Sample Crosscutting Assessments\"\"; \"\"Appendix J   Assessment at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Army Research Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratories\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Appendix K   Examples of Peer Review Conducted at Federal R&D Organizations\"\"\"\"Appendix L   Metrics Applied by National Research "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Council Panels to Assessment of the Army Research Laboratories\"\""]