{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":35,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":35,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3],[20,2,20,3],[20,4,20,5],[21,2,21,3],[21,4,21,5],[22,2,22,3],[22,4,22,5],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[30,2,30,3],[30,4,30,5],[31,2,31,3],[31,4,31,5],[32,2,32,3],[33,2,33,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910461955903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Preziosi Donald <1941, >"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"In the aftermath of art : ethics, aesthetics, politics / / Donald Preziosi ; critical commentary, Johanne Lamoureux"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London ; ; New York : , : Routledge, , 2006"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-64361-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-203-96135-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-134-23188-1"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (185 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Critical voices in art, theory and culture"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"707.2/2"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Art - Historiography"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Art museums - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"in the aftermath of art ethics, aesthetics, politics; Copyright; Contents; Series Editor's Preface; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Subjects, objects and object lessons; 1. La vi(ll)e en rose: reading Jameson mapping space; 2. The question of art history; 3. Collecting/museums; 4. The art of Art History; 5. The crystalline veil and the phallomorphic imaginary; 6. Romulus, Rebus, and the gaze of Victoria; 7. Seeing through art history: showing scars of legibility; Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","By juxtaposing issues and problems, Donald Preziosi's latest collection of essays, In the Aftermath of Art, opens up multiple interpretive possibilities by bringing to the surface hidden resonances in the implications of each text. In re-reading his own writings, Preziosi opens up alternatives to contemporary discourses on art history and visual culture. A critical commentary by critic, historian, and theorist Johanne Lamoureux complements the author's own introduction, mirroring the multiple interpretations within the essays themselves."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996320245003316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Albrecht Stephan"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Freiheit, Kontrolle und Verantwortlichkeit in der Gesellschaft. Moderne Biotechnologie als Lehrstück"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Hamburg, : Hamburg University Press, 2006"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (459)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Biotechnology"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Tedesco"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The responsibility of science is the starting point for intensive discussions. But who is responsible ty for what? This work is based on many years of research into the developments in modern biotechnology. The thorough analysis shows that responsibility is usually borne by the others. Political, legal, administrative and intra-scientific communication and action structures prevent or dilute responsibility to the point of inaccessibility. Stephan Albrecht uses numerous examples from the fields of medicine, agriculture, pharmacy and environmental technology to demonstrate that biotechnological progress is not evolutionary but political, man-made. However, a fundamental error in this progress is that it is not properly understood and negotiated in public, as a res publica. From a democratic point of view, the author proposes an institutional approach to the perception of responsibility in and for the sciences, which is oriented towards the specific challenges of technological innovation and at the same time builds on the best practices of political and civic decision-making."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910617895003321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Non definito"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Periodico"]