{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[16,2,16,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910458602503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Stannard David E"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Shrinking history [[electronic resource] ] : on Freud and the failure of psychohistory / / David E. Stannard"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, : Oxford University Press, 1980"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-280-60511-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-19-536537-2"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (208 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"901/.9"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Psychohistory"]
[{"$nulls":4},"History - Methodology"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Contents; Preface; Acknowledgements; The Lessons of Leonardo; The Problem of Therapy; The Problem of Logic; The Problem of Theory; The Problem of Culture; The Failure of Psychohistory; Notes; Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Studies the burgeoning field of psychohistory - from Freud, its primogenitor, to its present-day academic practitioners - and argues that little, if any, psychohistory is good history. The author points out the pitfalls, sheer irrationality, and ultimately a historical nature of this mode of historical inquiry."]