{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910457612303321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Recco Greg <1967->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Athens victorious [[electronic resource] ] : democracy in Plato's Republic / / Greg Recco"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Lanham, MD, : Lexington Books, c2007"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-28355-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613283559"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-7391-4430-8"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (263 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"320.1"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Democracy - Greece - Athens - History - To 1500"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 241-247) and index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Athens Victorious examines the notion of freedom in Plato's Republic, the proper understanding of which the author argues is essential for understanding the dialogue's ultimate political message. A close, thorough, and innovative analysis of the section of the dialogue in which various constitutional options are discussed leads to the surprising conclusion that the dialogue is advocating democracy, not some kind of totalitarian state."]