{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":22,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":22,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910457503203321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Retributivism has a past [[electronic resource] ] : has it a future? / / edited by Michael Tonry"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Oxford ; ; New York, : Oxford University Press, c2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-19-991937-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-283-42738-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613427380"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-19-979840-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (304 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Studies in penal theory and philosophy"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"364.601"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Punishment - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Retribution"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Contents; Preface; Contributors; 1. Can Twenty-first Century Punishment Policies Be Justified in Principle?; 2. Is Twenty-first Century Punishment Post-desert?; 3. What Does Wrongdoing Deserve?; 4. Responsibility, Restoration, and Retribution; 5. Punishment and Desert-adjusted Utilitarianism; 6. The Future of State Punishment: The Role of Public Opinion in Sentencing; 7. A Political Theory of Imprisonment for Public Protection; 8. Terror as a Theory of Punishment; 9. Can Above-desert Penalties Be Justified by Competing Deontological Theories?"]
[{"$nulls":4},"10. Never Mind the Pain, It's a Measure! Justifying Measures as Part of the Dutch Bifurcated System of Sanctions11. Retributivism, Proportionality, and the Challenge of the Drug Court Movement; 12. Drug Treatment Courts as Communicative Punishment; 13. Punishment Futures: The Desert-model Debate and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context; Index;"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","For nearly two centuries in the United States, the punishment of crime was largely aimed, in theory and in practice, at prevention, rehabilitation or incapacitation, and deterrence. In the mid-1970's, a sharp-and some argued permanent-shift occurred. Punishment in the criminal justice system became first and foremost about retribution. Retribution trumped rehabilitation; proportionality outweighed prevention. The retributivist sea change was short-lived, however. After "]
[{"$nulls":4},"a few decades, some policy makers returned tentatively to individualized approaches to punishment, launching initiatives like..."]