{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":25,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":25,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[18,2,18,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910455919303321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Major award decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation [[electronic resource] /] / Panel on NSF Decisionmaking for Major Awards, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, 1994"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-280-24690-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786610246908"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-309-58632-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-585-14312-9"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (xii, 160 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"507.9"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Science - Awards - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Research grants - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","\"National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine.\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"B-274\"--T.p. verso."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 156-160)."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"MAJOR AWARD DECISION MAKING AT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION\"\"; \"\"Copyright\"\"; \"\"Preface\"\"; \"\"Contents\"\"; \"\"Executive Summary\"\"; \"\"BACKGROUND\"\"; \"\"FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS\"\"; \"\"Clear Rules of the Game\"\"; \"\"Primacy of Technical Merit\"\"; \"\"Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff\"\"; \"\"Public Documentation of Decision making\"\"; \"\"More Stringent Setting of Priorities\"\"; \"\"RECOMMENDATIONS\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria\"\"\"\"Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 8: Planning the Review Process and Criteria\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 9: More and Better Public Documentation of Award Decisions\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 10: More Recompetitions\"\"; \"\"1 Major Awards at NSF \"\"; \"\"OVERVIEW OF MAJOR AWARDS\"\"; \"\"MAJOR AWARDS "]
[{"$nulls":4},"AND MERIT REVIEW\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"MAJOR AWARDS AND THE NSB\"\"\"\"NSF ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING FOR MERIT REVIEW\"\"; \"\"OVERALL CONCLUSIONS\"\"; \"\"Clear Rules of the Game\"\"; \"\"Primacy of Technical Merit\"\"; \"\"Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff\"\"; \"\"Public Documentation of Decision making\"\"; \"\"More Stringent Setting of Priorities\"\"; \"\"2 Planning Major Projects \"\"; \"\"BACKGROUND: PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING AT NSF\"\"; \"\"Long-Range Planning at NSF\"\"; \"\"Annual Budget Process\"\"; \"\"MAJOR PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING\"\"; \"\"Capital Facilities Planning\"\"; \"\"FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING AND BUDGETING\"\"; \"\"Findings\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Recommendations\"\"\"\"Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning\"\"; \"\"3 Awarding Major Projects: Criteria and Review Procedures \"\"; \"\"BACKGROUND: THE MERIT REVIEW PROCESS AT NSF\"\"; \"\"Current Review Criteria\"\"; \"\"Review and Selection Criteria for Major Project Awards\"\"; \"\"Findings and Recommendations on Criteria\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion\"\"\"\"NSF PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING PROPOSALS\"\"; \"\"Proposal Review Process\"\"; \"\"Peer Review Modes\"\"; \"\"Selection of Reviewers\"\"; \"\"Policies and Procedures for Dealing with Bias and Conflict of Interest\"\"; \"\"Award Decision making\"\"; \"\"Findings and Recommendations on Review Procedures\"\"; \"\"Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process\"\"; \"\"4 Awarding Major Projects: NSB Role, Review Process Design, and Decision Documentation \"\"; \"\"NSB ROLE AND PROCEDURES\"\"; \"\"Findings and Recommendations on the NSB Role\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload\"\""]