{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":22,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":22,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910455242203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Featherstone Mike"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Undoing culture [[electronic resource] ] : globalization, postmoderism and identity / / Mike Featherstone"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London, : SAGE, 1995"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-8039-7605-4"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4462-5045-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-84860-916-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-585-36550-4"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"192p"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Theory, culture & society"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"306"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Culture"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Popular culture - History - 20th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Postmodernism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Consumers - History - 20th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Reprinted 2000."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [158]-171) and index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This title explores the formation and deformation of the cultural sphere and the effects on culture of globalization. Against many orthodox postmodernist accounts,the author argues that it is wrong to regard our present state of fragmentation and dislocation as an epochal break. Existing interdependencies and power balances are not so easily broken down."]