{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[14,2,14,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910454990103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Phillips Michael J"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The Lochner court, myth and reality [[electronic resource] ] : substantive due process from the 1890s to the 1930s / / Michael J. Phillips"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Westport, Conn., : Praeger, 2001"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-313-00076-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (223 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"347.73/5"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Due process of law - United States - History"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [201]-204) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Contents; Preface; 1 The Conventional Wisdom; 2 An Overview of Lochner Era Substantive Due Process; 3 What Motivated the Old Court; 4 The Question of Unequal Bargaining Power; 5 The Originalist Challenge; 6 Summing Up and Looking Ahead; Table of Cases; Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This text systematically examines all of the US Supreme Court's substantive due process cases from 1897 to 1937 and finds that they do not support long-held beliefs about the Lochner Court. The Court struck down far fewer laws on substantive due process grounds than is generally believed."]