{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":53,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":53,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[20,2,20,3],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[24,4,24,5],[25,2,25,3],[25,4,25,5],[26,2,26,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[30,2,30,3],[31,2,31,3],[32,2,32,3],[35,2,35,3],[36,2,36,3],[38,2,38,3],[41,2,41,3],[41,4,41,5],[42,2,42,3],[42,4,42,5],[43,2,43,3],[43,4,43,5],[44,2,44,3],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3],[47,2,47,3],[48,2,48,3],[49,2,49,3],[50,2,50,3],[51,2,51,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910454840103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Ando Clifford <1969->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Imperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman Empire [[electronic resource] /] / Clifford Ando"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Berkeley, : University of California Press, c2000"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-520-92372-3"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-59734-672-1"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (520 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Classics and contemporary thought ; ; 6"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"937/.06"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Allegiance - Rome"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Political stability - Rome"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Roman provinces - Administration"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Rome History Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D Influence"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Rome Cultural policy Influence"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 413-449) and indexes."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Front matter -- CONTENTS -- List of Illustrations -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction: Communis Patria -- 2. Ideology in the Roman Empire -- 3. The Roman Achievement in Ancient Thought -- 4. The Communicative Actions of the Roman Government -- 5. Consensus in Theory and Practice -- 6. The Creation of Consensus -- 7. Images of Emperor and Empire -- 8. Orbis Terrarum and Orbis Romanus -- 9. The King Is a Body Politick . . . for that a Body Politique Never Dieth -- 10. Conclusion: Singulare et Unicum Imperium -- Works Cited -- General Index -- Index Locorum"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. Rather, its uniqueness stems from the culture it created and the loyalty it inspired across an area that stretched from the Tyne to the Euphrates. Moreover, the empire created this culture with a bureaucracy smaller than that of a typical late-twentieth-century research university. In approaching this problem, Clifford Ando does not ask the ever-fashionable question, Why did the Roman empire fall? Rather, he asks, Why did the empire last so long? Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified. This consensus was itself the "]
[{"$nulls":4},"product of a complex conversation between the central government and its far-flung peripheries. Ando investigates the mechanisms that sustained this conversation, explores its contribution to the legitimation of Roman power, and reveals as its product the provincial absorption of the forms and content of Roman political and legal discourse. Throughout, his sophisticated and subtle reading is informed by current thinking on social formation by theorists such as Max Weber, Jürgen Habermas, and Pierre Bourdieu."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910481029803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Uffelmann Dirk"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Vladimir Sorokin's Discourses : A Companion / / Dirk Uffelmann"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Boston, MA : , : Academic Studies Press, , [2020]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2020"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-64469-286-4"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (ix, 225 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Companions to Russian Literature"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"891.73/5"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Russian prose literature - 20th century - History and criticism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Russian prose literature - 21st century - History and criticism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Front matter -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgments -- A Note on Transliteration, Translation, and Referencing -- Disclaimer -- 1. Introduction: The Late Soviet Union and Moscow's Artistic Underground -- 2. The Queue and Collective Speech -- 3. The Norm and Socialist Realism -- 4. Marina's Thirtieth Love and Dissident Narratives -- 5. A Novel and Classical Russian Literature -- 6. A Month in Dachau and Entangled Totalitarianisms -- 7. Sorokin's New Media Strategies and Civic Position in Post-Soviet Russia -- 8. Blue Lard and Pulp Fiction -- 9. Ice and Esoteric Fanaticism-a New Sorokin? -- 10. Day of the Oprichnik and Political (Anti-)Utopias -- 11. The Blizzard and Self-References of a Meta-Classic -- 12. Manaraga and Reactionary Anti-Globalism -- 13. Discontinuity in Continuity: Prospects -- Bibliography -- Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Vladimir Sorokin is the most prominent and the most controversial contemporary Russian writer. Having emerged as a prose writer in Moscow's artistic underground in the late 1970s and early 80s, he became visible to a broader Russian audience only in the mid-1990s, with texts shocking the moralistic expectations of traditionally minded readers by violating not only Soviet ideological taboos, but also injecting vulgar language, sex, and violence into plots that the postmodernist Sorokin borrowed from nineteenth-century literature and Socialist Realism. Sorokin became famous when the Putin youth organization burned his books in 2002 and he picked up neo-nationalist and neo-imperialist discourses in his dystopian novels of "]
[{"$nulls":4},"the 2000s and 2010s, making him one of the fiercest critics of Russia's \"new middle ages,\" while remaining steadfast in his dismantling of foreign discourses."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISALENTO991004356637807536"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Gentili, Anna Maria"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Africa come storia : elementi del dibattito sulla natura della transizione nelle società e nei sistemi africani / di Anna Maria Gentili, Giorgio Mizzau e Irma Taddia ; con saggi di Silvana Contento ... [et al.] , presentazione di Bernardo Bernardi"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Milano : Angeli, c1980"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"8820417774"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"437 p. ; 22 cm"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"La società ; 77"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"960"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Africa Sviluppo sociale"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]