{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":50,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":50,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[20,2,20,3],[25,2,25,3],[25,4,25,5],[26,2,26,3],[26,4,26,5],[27,2,27,3],[27,4,27,5],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[33,2,33,3],[34,2,34,3],[35,2,35,3],[36,2,36,3],[39,2,39,3],[40,2,40,3],[44,2,44,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910454277003321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Regulating policing : the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 past, present and future / edited by Ed Cape and Richard Young"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2008"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4725-6451-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-282-04843-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612048432"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-84731-454-6"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (296 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"345.42052"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Police power - England"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Police power - Wales"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Criminal investigation - Law and legislation - England"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Criminal investigation - Law and legislation - Wales"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Introduction -- Ed Cape and Richard Young -- Authorize and Regulate: A Comparative Perspective on the Rise and Fall of a Regulatory Strategy -- David Dixon -- Can coercive powers be effectively controlled or regulated? -- Andrew Sanders -- PACE: A View From The Custody Suite -- John Coppen -- Keeping PACE? Some front line policing perspectives -- John Long -- Tipping the Scales of Justice?: A Review of the Impact of PACE on the Police, Due Process and the Search for Truth 1984-2006 -- Barbara Wilding -- Street Policing After PACE: The Drift to Summary Justice -- Richard Young -- PACE then and now: 21 years of 're-balancing' -- Ed Cape -- The role of defence lawyers in a 're-balanced' system -- Anthony Edwards -- Police and Prosecutors after PACE: The Road from Case Construction to Case Disposal -- John Jackson"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) was an innovative and controversial attempt to regulate the investigation of crime. Two decades on, it now operates in a very different context than in the mid-1980s. Whilst legal advice has become established as a basic right of those arrested and detained by the police, the police service has become increasingly professionalised but also increasingly driven by "]
[{"$nulls":4},"government objectives and targets. The Crown Prosecution Service, originally established to separate prosecution from investigation, is now becoming involved in the investigative process with the power to make charge decisions. Although the basic structure of PACE has survived, almost continual revision and amendment has resulted in a markedly different creature than that which was originally enacted. In 2007 the government embarked on a further review of PACE, promising to 're-focus the investigation and evidence gathering processes [to deliver] 21st century policing powers to meet the demands of 21st century crime'. This collection brings together some of the leading academic experts, police officers and defence lawyers who have a wealth of experience of researching and working with the PACE provisions. They examine the critical questions and issues surrounding PACE, providing unique and exciting insights into the demands and challenges of the regulation of policing. Contributors David Dixon, Professor of Law, University of New South Wales - 'Authorise and Regulate: A Comparative Perspective on the Rise and Fall of a Regulatory Strategy'. Andrew Sanders, Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Manchester. 'Can Coercive Powers be Effectively Controlled or Regulated?'. John Coppen, Police Federation spokesperson on police custody issues. 'PACE: A View From the Custody Suite'. John Long, Assistant Chief Constable, Avon and Somerset Constabulary 'Keeping PACE? Some Front Line Policing Perspectives'. Barbara Wilding, Chief Constable, South Wales Police. 'Tipping the Scales of Justice? A Review of the Impact of PACE on the Police, Due Process and the Search for the Truth 1984-2006'. Richard Young, Professor of Law and Policy Research, University of Bristol. 'Street Policing After PACE: The Drift to Summary Justice'. Ed Cape, Professor of Criminal Law and Practice, University of the West of England. 'PACE Then and Now: 21 Years of \"Re-balancing\"'. Anthony Edwards, Leading criminal defence solicitor. 'The Role of Defence Lawyers in a \"Re-balanced\" System'. John Jackson, Professor of Public Law, Queen's University, Belfast. 'Police and Prosecutors after PACE: The Road from Case Construction to Case Disposal'.\"--Bloomsbury Publishing"]
[{"$nulls":4},"The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) was an innovative and controversial attempt to regulate the investigation of crime. Two decades on, it now operates in a very different context than in the mid-1980s. Whilst legal advice has become established as a basic right of those arrested and detained by the police, the police service has become increasingly professionalised but also increasingly driven by government objectives and targets. The Crown Prosecution Service, originally established to separate prosecution from investigation, is now becoming involved in the investigative process with the power to make charge decisions. Although the basic structure of PACE has survived, almost continual revision and amendment has resulted in a markedly different creature than that which was originally enacted. In 2007 the government embarked on a further review of PACE, promising to 're-focus the investigation and evidence gathering processes [to deliver] 21st century policing powers to meet the demands of 21st century crime'. This collection brings together some of the leading academic experts, police officers and defence lawyers who have a wealth of experience of researching and working with the PACE provisions. They examine the critical questions and issues surrounding PACE, providing unique and exciting insights into the demands and challenges of the regulation of policing. Contributors David Dixon, Professor of Law, University of New South Wales - 'Authorise and Regulate: A Comparative Perspective on the Rise and Fall of a "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Regulatory Strategy'. Andrew Sanders, Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Manchester. 'Can Coercive Powers be Effectively Controlled or Regulated?'. John Coppen, Police Federation spokesperson on police custody issues. 'PACE: A View From the Custody Suite'. John Long, Assistant Chief Constable, Avon and Somerset Constabulary 'Keeping PACE? Some Front Line Policing Perspectives'. Barbara Wilding, Chief Constable, South Wales Police. 'Tipping the Scales of Justice? A Review of the Impact of PACE on the Police, Due Process and the Search for the Truth 1984-2006'. Richard Young, Professor of Law and Policy Research, University of Bristol. 'Street Policing After PACE: The Drift to Summary Justice'. Ed Cape, Professor of Criminal Law and Practice, University of the West of England. 'PACE Then and Now: 21 Years of \"Re-balancing\"'. Anthony Edwards, Leading criminal defence solicitor. 'The Role of Defence Lawyers in a \"Re-balanced\" System'. John Jackson, Professor of Public Law, Queen's University, Belfast. 'Police and Prosecutors after PACE: The Road from Case Construction to Case Disposal'"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910791903603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Rubin Olivier"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Democracy and famine / / Olivier Rubin"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; ; New York : , : Routledge, , 2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-58995-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613902405"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-203-83671-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-136-86542-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (225 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Routledge research in comparative politics ; ; 37"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"363.8"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Food supply - Political aspects"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Famines - Prevention"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Democracy"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [182]-195) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Democracy and Famine; Copyright; Contents; Illustrations; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; 1 Introduction; Structure of book; 2 Presentation of Sen's theory of democracy and famine; Outlining Sen's theory of democracy and famine; Earlier critiques of Sen's democracy theory; The three different democracy propositions; 3 Conceptualization and operationalization of democracy; Conceptualizing democracy; The question of governance; Conclusion; Operationalization of democracy; Conclusion; 4 Discussion of Sen's understanding of democracy; Inferring from Sen's writings"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Inferring from Sen's empirical example, IndiaConclusion; 5 Famines in Bangladesh, Sudan and India; The concept of famine and case-study design; The 1974 Bangladesh famine; The Sudanese famine of 1986-89; Indian famines since independence; Conclusion; 6 The Malawi famine of 2002; The Malawian democracy; The Malawian famine; Tracing system deficiencies; Conclusion; 7 The Niger famine of 2005; Democracy in Niger; The Niger famine; Tracing system deficiencies; Conclusion; 8 Democracy and famine: Quantitative evidence; Existing cross-country empirical evidence; Cross-country empirical evidence"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Conclusion9 Multiple starvation deaths in India; Starvation deaths in West Bengal; The political triggers; Legal assembly dynamics; The politicized panchayats; Distrust and stigmatization; The village-specific factors; Conclusion; 10 Discussion of other macro-level causal "]
[{"$nulls":4},"approaches; De Waal's anti-famine contract; Dan Banik's freedom; Neumayer and Plümper's electorate size; 11 Counter-productive democratic mechanisms; The validity of the three propositions; The limitations of the focus on democracy and politicization; Conclusion; 12 Conclusion; The three propositions - results"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Moving beyond the focus on democracyBibliography; Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Famine is the most extreme manifestation of the existence of poverty, inequality and political apathy. Whereas poverty, hunger and diseases are not easily eradicated in the world today, famines are often perceived to be relatively simple to avert. However, the political incentives to prevent famines are not always present. Inspired by the work of Amartya Sen, whose influential hypothesis that democratic institutions together with a free press provide effective protection from famine, Democracy and Famine is a study combining qualitative and quantitative evidence, analysing t"]