{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":25,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":25,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[21,2,21,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910450402503321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Thinking about political psychology / / edited by James H. Kuklinski [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2002"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-107-12747-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-280-41724-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-14578-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-18072-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-06592-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-05961-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-30766-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-51063-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-06805-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (ix, 354 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Cambridge studies in public opinion and political psychology"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"320/.01/9"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Political psychology"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Half-title; Series-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; List of Contributors; Introduction: Political Psychology and the Study of Politics; DEFINING POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY; THEORY AND CONTEXT; THE PSYCHOLOGY-POLITICS NEXUS; POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND AGGREGATE OPINION; FINAL COMMENT; References; 1 The Contours of Political Psychology: Situating Research on Political Information Processing; 2 Who Can Persuade Whom?: Implications from the Nexus of Psychology and Rational Choice Theory; 3 Expanding the Envelope: Citizenship, Contextual Methodologies, and Comparative Political Psychology"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4 The Challenges of Political Psychology: Lessons to Be Learned from Research on Attitude Perception5 Political Psychology and Political Science; 6 Is Political Psychology Sufficiently Psychological? Distinguishing Political Psychology from Psychological Political...; 7 Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Politics: Questions of Aggregation, Causal Distance, and Taste; 8 The Micro Foundations of Mood; 9 From Denial to Extenuation (and Finally Beyond): Political Sophistication and Citizen Performance; 10 Political Psychology and the "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Micro-Macro Gap in Politics; Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In this 2002 volume, political psychologists take a hard look at political psychology. They pose and then address, the kinds of tough questions that those outside the field would be inclined to ask and those inside should be able to answer satisfactorily. Not everyone will agree with the answers the authors provide and in some cases, the best an author can do is offer well-grounded speculations. Nonetheless, the chapters raise questions that will lead to an improved political psychology and will generate further discussion and research in the field. The individual chapters are organised around four themes. Part I tries to define political psychology and provides an overview of the field. Part II raises questions about theory and empirical methods in political psychology. Part III contains arguments ranging from the position that the field is too heavily psychological to the view that it is not psychological enough. Part IV considers how political psychologists might best connect individual-level mental processes to aggregate outcomes."]