{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":50,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":50,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[19,2,19,3],[19,4,19,5],[20,2,20,3],[20,4,20,5],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[31,2,31,3],[37,2,37,3],[38,2,38,3],[42,2,42,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910416501603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Espinosa Medrano Juan de"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Apologético en favor de don Luis de Góngora, príncipe de los poetas líricos de España, contra Manuel de Faría y Sousa, caballero portugués / / Juan de Espinosa Medrano"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Paris, : e-Spania Books, 2020"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2-919448-29-3"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Literature&#44; Romance"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Góngora"]
[{"$nulls":4},"querelle littéraire"]
[{"$nulls":4},"hyperbate"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Faria e Sousa"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Espinosa Medrano"]
[{"$nulls":4},"polémica literaria"]
[{"$nulls":4},"hipérbaton"]
[{"$nulls":4},"literary dispute"]
[{"$nulls":4},"hyperbaton"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Spagnolo"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","El Apologético de Espinosa Medrano es un testimonio tardío de la polémica gongorina, el único escrito en América por un defensor del poeta. Se trata de un tratado erudito de crítica literaria en el que un joven predicador y catedrático de Artes y Teología hace gala de su saber, su gracia y su estilo para defender al príncipe de los poetas de España contra los ataques vertidos por Manuel de Faria e Sousa, polígrafo portugués y defensor de Camões. Publicado en Lima en 1662, el libro es también una reivindicación criolla de Espinosa Medrano y de su círculo, apoyada en un contexto imperial complejo. La presente edición crítica, acompañada de un estudio preliminar y de abundante anotación, ofrece una nueva lectura del tratado y de sus fuentes, integrándolo en el corpus de la polémica gongorina en el que su autor lo incluyó."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996214689103316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Francisco J. Ayala and Robert Arp"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Malden, MA, : Blackwell Pub., 2010"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-20471-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613204714"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-119-97240-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4443-1492-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4443-1493-9"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (440 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Contemporary debates in philosophy"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"570.1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"574.01"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Biology - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Evolution (Biology) - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Biologia"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Filosofia"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Evolució (Biologia)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Llibres electrònics"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology\"\"; \"\"Contents\"\"; \"\"Notes on Contributors\"\"; \"\"General Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"PART I IS IT POSSIBLE TOREDUCE BIOLOGICALEXPLANATIONS TOEXPLANATIONS INCHEMISTRY AND/ORPHYSICS?\"\"; \"\"Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER ONE It Is Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and/or Physics\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER TWO It Is Not Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and/or Physics\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"PART II HAVE TRAITS EVOLVED TO FUNCTION THE WAY THEY DO BECAUSE OF A PAST ADVANTAGE?\"\"\"\"Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER THREE Traits Have Evolved to Function the Way They Do Because of a Past Advantage\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER FOUR Traits Have Not Evolved to Function the Way They Do Because of a Past Advantage\"\"; \"\"PART III ARE SPECIES REAL?\"\"; \"\"Introduction\"\"; "]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER FIVE Species Are Real Biological Entities\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER SIX Species Are Not Uniquely Real Biological Entities\"\"; \"\"PART IV DOES SELECTION OPERATE PRIMARILY ON GENES?\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Introduction\"\"\"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER SEVEN Selection Does Operate Primarily on Genes: In Defense of the Gene as the Unit of Selection\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER EIGHT Selection Does Not Operate Primarily on Genes\"\"; \"\"PART V ARE MICROEVOLUTION AND MACROEVOLUTION GOVERNED BY THE SAME PROCESSES?\"\"; \"\"Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER NINE Microevolution and Macroevolution are Governed by the Same Processes\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER TEN Microevolution and Macroevolution Are Not Governed by the Same Processes\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"PART VI DOES EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OFFER A SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGE TO THE NEO-DARWINIAN PARADIGM?\"\"\"\"Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER ELEVEN Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER TWELVE Evolutionary Developmental Biology Does Not Offer a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm\"\"; \"\"PART VII WERE THE BASIC COMPONENTS OF THE HUMAN MIND SOLIDIFIED DURING THE PLEISTOCENE EPOCH?\"\"; \"\"Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"CHAPTER THIRTEEN The Basic Components of the Human Mind Were Solidified During the Pleistocene Epoch\"\"\"\"CHAPTER FOURTEEN The Basic Components of the Human Mind Were Not Solidified During the Pleistocene Epoch\"\"; \"\"PART VIII DOES MEMETICS PROVIDE A USEFUL WAY OF UNDERSTANDING CULTURAL EVOLUTION?\"\"; \"\"Introduction\"\"; \"\"References and Further Reading\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER FIFTEEN Memetics Does Provide a Useful Way of Understanding Cultural Evolution\"\"; \"\"CHAPTER SIXTEEN Memetics Does Not Provide a Useful Way of Understanding Cultural Evolution\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"PART IX CAN THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ACT AS A GROUND FOR ETHICS?\"\""]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This collection of specially commissioned essays puts top scholars head to head to debate the central issues in the lively and fast growing field of philosophy of biology   Brings together original essays on ten of the most hotly debated questions in philosophy of biology Lively head-to-head debate format sharply defines the issues and paves the way for further discussion Includes coverage of the new and vital area of evolutionary developmental biology, as well as the concept of a unified species, the role of genes in selection, the differences between micro- and macro-evolution, and much more"]