{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[14,2,14,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910367632703321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Making institutional repositories work / / edited by Burton B. Callicott, David Scherer, and Andrew Wesolek"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"West Lafayette, Indiana : , : Purdue University Press, , [2016]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2016"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-55753-902-2"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (xxvi, 360 pages) : illustrations"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Charleston insights in library, archival, and information sciences"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"025.04"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Institutional repositories"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Institutional repositories - United States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Foreword: A Few Reflections on the Evolution of Institutional Repositories -- Introduction -- PART 1 CHOOSING A PLATFORM -- [PART 1 Introduction] -- 1 Choosing a Repository Platform: Open Source vs. Hosted Solutions -- 2 Repository Options for Research Data -- 3 Ensuring Discoverability of IR Content -- PART 2 SETTING POLICIES -- [PART 2 Introduction] -- 4 Open Access Policies: Basics and Impact on Content Recruitment -- 5 Responsibilities and Rights: Balancing the Institutional Imperative for Open Access With Authors' Self-Determination -- 6 Campus Open Access Policy Implementation Models and Implications for IR Services -- 7 Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Preparing Graduate Students for Their Futures -- 8 Systematically Populating an IR With ETDs: Launching a Retrospective Digitization Project and Collecting Current ETDs -- PART 3 RECRUITING AND CREATING CONTENT -- [PART 3 Introduction] -- 9 Faculty Self-Archiving -- 10 Incentivizing Them to Come: Strategies, Tools, and Opportunities for Marketing an Institutional Repository  -- 11 Repository as Publishing Platform -- 12 Publishing Pedagogy: The Institutional Repository as Training Ground for a New Breed of Academic Journal Editors -- PART 4 MEASURING SUCCESS -- [PART 4 Introduction] -- 13 Purposeful Metrics: Matching Institutional Repository Metrics to Purpose and Audience -- 14 Social Media Metrics as Indicators of Repository Impact -- 15 Peer Review and Institutional Repositories -- 16 Defining Success and Impact for Scholars, Department Chairs, and Administrators: Is There a Sweet Spot? -- PART 5 INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES IN PRACTICE: : CASE STUDIES -- 17 "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Creating the IR Culture -- 18 On Implementing an Open Source Institutional Repository -- 19 Interlinking Institutional Repository Content and Enhancing User Experiences -- 20 Populating Your Institutional Repository and Promoting Your Students: IRs and Undergraduate Research -- PART 6 CLOSING REFLECTIONS AND THE NEXT STEPS FOR INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES -- [PART 6 Introduction] -- 21 Next Steps for IRs and Open Access -- About the Contributors -- Index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Quickly following what many expected to be a wholesale revolution in library practices, institutional repositories encountered unforeseen problems and a surprising lack of impact. Clunky or cumbersome interfaces, lack of perceived value and use by scholars, fear of copyright infringement, and the like tended to dampen excitement and adoption."]