{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":28,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[14,2,14,3],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[19,4,19,5],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996344239003316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Grafenstein Maximilian von"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The principle of purpose limitation in data protection laws : the risk-based approach, principles, and private standards as elements for regulating innovation / / Maximilian von Grafenstein"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2018"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-8452-9084-6"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 electronic resource (676 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Schriften zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Innovationsforschung"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"342.0858"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Data protection - Law and legislation - European Union countries"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Data protection - Law and legislation - Germany"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Data protection - Law and legislation"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Introduction -- Conceptual definitions as a link for regulation -- The function of the principle of purpose limitation in light of Article 8 ECFR and further fundamental rights -- Empirical approach in order to assist answering open legal questions -- Final conclusion: The principle of purpose limitation can not only be open towards but also enhancing innovation."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This thesis examines the principle of purpose limitation in data protection law from the perspective of regulating data-driven innovation. According to this approach, the principle of purpose limitation not only protects an individual’s autonomy but simultaneously leaves sufficient room for data controllers to innovate when finding the best solution for protection. The first component of the principle of purpose limitation (i.e. to specify the purpose of data processing) is a precautionary protection instrument which obliges the controller to identify specific risks arising from its processing against all fundamental rights of the data subject. In contrast, the second component (i.e. the requirement to limit data processing to the preceding purpose) aims to control the risk caused by data processing that occurred at a later stage and adds to the risks which were previously identified. This approach provides an answer to the question of how the General Data Protection Regulation which does not only effectively protect an individual’s autonomy but also helps controllers to turn their legal compliance into a mechanism that enhances "]
[{"$nulls":4},"innovation, should be interpreted with regard to all the fundamental rights of the data subject."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910346751803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Jong-Tsun Huang"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Twenty Years After the Iowa Gambling Task: Rationality, Emotion, and Decision-Making"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Frontiers Media SA, 2018"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (275 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Frontiers Research Topics"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Neurosciences"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The world is full of uncertainty. In unpredictable circumstances, can emotions facilitate advantageous decision-making? A neuroscience team, led by Antonio Damasio, explored this question using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). To the present day, the findings of numerous IGT-related investigations strongly influence clinical and interdisciplinary research, for example, in neuroeconomics and neuromarketing. This special issue examines IGT-based research progress over the past 20 years through literature reviews, clinical examinations, model construction, theoretical integration, and brain imaging technology. Both supportive and opposing viewpoints are provided to frame correlations between rationality, emotion, decision-making, and IGT. Potential future directions for IGT studies are discussed"]