{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910346016903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Delfim F. Leão"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"A Poiesis da democracia"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Coimbra University Press, 2018"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"989-26-1679-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (518 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Coimbra Companions"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Transport planning & policy"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Portoghese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The expression \"poiesis of democracy\" in the title refers to its central concern: to understand \"democracy\" not as a univocal and absolute concept, but as a result of historical permanencies and transformations inherent of both its Greek formulation and its contemporary uses, that is, as a problem whose answers derive from permanently meditated and mediated negotiation. Thus, the main problem dealt with in the volume is the analysis - preferably interdisciplinary and open to multiple theoretical methodological approaches - of the construction of the concept of Athenian democracy as a problematic political and cultural arena (and not as a goal, structure or program), perceptible in different authors and discourses of the classical period, as well as reflections that supplemented them throughout the fifth and fourth centuries BC."]