{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":30,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":30,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[8,2,8,3],[8,4,8,5],[9,2,9,3],[9,4,9,5],[10,2,10,3],[10,4,10,5],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[27,2,27,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISALENTO991002264479707536"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Pinto, Aldo"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Il restauro della sede del dipartimento di diritto romano e storia della scienza romanistica nel complesso del Salvatore / Aldo Pinto"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Napoli : L'arte tipografica, 1998"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"28 p., [8] c. di tav. ; 25 cm."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910337726103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Rigotti Eddo"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Inference in Argumentation : A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes / / by Eddo Rigotti, Sara Greco"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2019"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-030-04568-4"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 2019.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (349 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Argumentation Library, , 1566-7650 ; ; 34"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"808.53"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Comparative linguistics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Language and languages—Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Communication"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Comparative Linguistics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Philosophy of Language"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Communication Studies"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Acknowledgement -- Preface -- Part I: The Tradition of Topics -- Chapter 1. Aristotle's foundation of topics: the foundation of the study of inference in argumentation -- Chapter 2. Cicero's Topica and the establishment of the topical tradition by Boethius -- Chapter 3. The richness and originality of medieval contributions -- Chapter 4. After the Middle Ages -- Chapter 5. Modern and contemporary approaches -- Part II: The Argumentum Model of Topics -- Chapter 6. The inferential configuration of arguments: the Argumentum Model of Topics -- Chapter 7. Advanced theoretical perspectives and open questions -- Chapter 8. Analysis and evaluation of arguments in context -- Appendix -- Index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book investigates the role of inference in argumentation, considering how arguments support standpoints on the basis of different loci. The authors propose and illustrate a model for the analysis of the standpoint-argument connection, called Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT). A prominent feature of the AMT is that it distinguishes, within each and every single argumentation, between an inferential-procedural component, on which the reasoning process is based; and a material-contextual component, which anchors the argument in the interlocutors’ cultural and factual common ground. "]
[{"$nulls":4},"The AMT explains how these components differ and how they are intertwined within each single argument. This model is introduced in Part II of the book, following a careful reconstruction of the enormously rich tradition of studies on inference in argumentation, from the antiquity to contemporary authors, without neglecting medieval and post-medieval contributions. The AMT is a contemporary model grounded in a dialogue with such tradition, whose crucial aspects are illuminated in this book. ."]