{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910315243203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Anfray Jean-Pascal"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Bacon et Descartes : Genèse de la modernité philosophique / / Élodie Cassan"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Lyon, : ENS Éditions, 2014"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2-84788-525-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (194 p.)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"philosophie"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Bacon (Francis)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"modernité philosophique"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Descartes (René)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"early-modern philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"rationalism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"empiricism"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Comment la modernité philosophique, articulation d’une catégorie historique désignant les XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles et d’une démarche de rupture philosophique et scientifique avec les acquis aristotéliciens, peut-elle être incarnée exemplairement par des philosophes aussi différents que Bacon et Descartes ? Elle est souvent reconstituée de manière fictionnelle dans les termes d’un programme de recherche d’une emprise de l’homme sur la nature par la technique, élaboré par chacun de ces auteurs. Le caractère bien plus complexe de sa genèse réelle est rendu ici intelligible par une démarche dialectique, qui permet de reconstituer le tissu intellectuel liant ces deux penseurs et d’examiner en quoi se conviennent et s’opposent leurs conceptualités respectives. Les contributions présentées dans le volume montrent ainsi que l’histoire de la philosophie moderne est structurée par deux orientations de pensée articulées et s’influençant l’une l’autre, le rationalisme et l’empirisme.  Why are Bacon and Descartes, who belong to two different philosophical traditions, often regarded as having laid out the agenda for modern philosophy? It is true that they have rejected "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Aristotelism and that they have elaborated on the power of man over nature and on the importance of technique. However, the genesis of modern philosophy is a much more complex process, as the essays collected in this volume intend to show, by shedding light on the intellectual connections between these two philosophers, a question rarely treated in the existing literature. The resort to a dialectical methodology reveals the extent to which the history of modern philosophy is structured by two ways of thinking, which develop thanks to each other, namely, rationalism and empiricism."]