{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":23,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910315241703321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Renaude Noëlle"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Accidents : Essai épistolaire / / Noëlle Renaude, Barbara Métais-Chastanier"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Lyon, : ENS Éditions, 2016"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2-84788-692-3"]
[{"$nulls":4},"2-84788-748-2"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (258 p.)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Literature"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Theater"]
[{"$nulls":4},"accident"]
[{"$nulls":4},"dramaturgie"]
[{"$nulls":4},"processus de création"]
[{"$nulls":4},"théâtre"]
[{"$nulls":4},"recherche / création"]
[{"$nulls":4},"dramaturgy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"creation process"]
[{"$nulls":4},"theater"]
[{"$nulls":4},"research/creation"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Cette correspondance entre Noëlle Renaude et Barbara Métais-Chastanier, qui devait n’être au départ qu’un bref entretien, a pris la tournure d’un ouvrage plus conséquent qui s’est inventé pendant plus d’une année. Devenant essai à deux voix, débordant la question initiale de l’accident, de l’imprévu et du hasard, il explore au fil du dialogue, de manière poétique, critique et digressive, le processus d’une écriture liée à l’énigme de la scène.  Organisé en séquences journalières, le balancement des questions, des réponses et des réflexions, auquel se sont livrées librement les deux interlocutrices, a fini par produire, comme un accident, ce que Robert Cantarella appelle un « manuel de dérangement », et à cette occasion un traité sur le théâtre.  This epistolary conversation between Noëlle Renaude and Barbara Métais-Chastanier was initially meant to be a short interview, yet it turned into "]
[{"$nulls":4},"a more substantial piece of work that they invented together for over a year. Moving beyond the realm of the original topics of the accident, the unexpected, and chance, it became a two-voice essay which, over the course of the dialogue, explores a writing process, linked to the enigma of the stage, in a poetic, critical, and digressive way. In daily sequences, the two correspondents freely engaged in a seesaw of questions, answers, and reflections, which finally produced, as if by accident, what Robert Cantarella calls a “Guide to Disruption” and, on this occasion, a treatise on theater."]