{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":20,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":20,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[6,2,6,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910282228103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Somma Alessandro"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Diritto: storia e comparazione : Nuovi propositi per un binomio antico / / Massimo Brutti, Alessandro Somma (eds.)"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Frankfurt am Main, : Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, 2018"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Frankfurt am Main : , : Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, , 2018"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2018"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9783944773216"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3944773217"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (608)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Global perspectives on legal history, , 2196-9752 ; ; volume 11."]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"340.2"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Law - History"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Comparative law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Comparative law and the history of law are traditionally devoted to expanding the context of legal rules and legal institutions. Comparison involves history, as the well-known motto proclaims, but history also involves comparison. Both disciplines are in fact interested in deepening the space-time coordinates of law as a social phenomenon, which means that they take up a critical approach to their object of study.\nIn recent years, this trait is increasingly coming into conflict with the tendency to present law as a mere technocratic instrument for organizing societies. As a result of the »end of history« discourse, the Western economic and political order has become a definitive point of reference worldwide, with law scholars charged with identifying best practices to enhance their efficiency.\nA group of comparative lawyers and legal historians critically discuss this assumption from a theoretical point of view as well as from the perspective of their respective fields of research. The result is a multifaceted range of ideas on the significance and possible future of two disciplines that share, in addition to their traditional approach, a "]
[{"$nulls":4},"crisis of identity.\""]