{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910220078303321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Using pattern analysis and systematic randomness to allocate U.S. border security resources : technical report"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"RAND Corporation, 2012"]
[{"$nulls":4},"[Place of publication not identified], : RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center, 2012"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9780833077738"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0833077732"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"363.28/5"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Border security - Planning - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Border patrols - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Pattern recognition systems"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Political Science"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Law, Politics & Government"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Immigration & Emigration"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This report investigates how the Office of Border Patrol could employ pattern and trend analysis and systematic randomness to increase interdiction rates and mitigate smuggler adaptation. The analysis shows how approaches that combine the techniques yield higher interdiction rates than approaches using either technique alone, and it examines the circumstances in which combined approaches are competitive with perfect surveillance."]