{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":50,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":50,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[19,4,19,5],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[28,2,28,3],[28,4,28,5],[29,2,29,3],[29,4,29,5],[30,2,30,3],[30,4,30,5],[31,2,31,3],[33,2,33,3],[34,2,34,3],[35,2,35,3],[36,2,36,3],[42,2,42,3],[43,2,43,3],[47,2,47,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISALENTO991004263236507536"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Blumenberg, Hans"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Aspekte der Epochenschwelle : Cusaner und Nolaner : erweiterte und überarbeitete Neuausgabe von Die Legitimität der Neuzeit : vierter Teil / Hans Blumenberg"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Frankfurt am Main : Suhrkamp, 1985"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"351827774X"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[3. ed]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"186, [1] p. 18 cm"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Suhrkamp Taschenbuch. Wissenschaft ; 174"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"190"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Cosmologia"]
[{"$nulls":4},"NicolÃ² da Cusa"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Bruno, Giordano"]
[{"$nulls":4},"NicolÃ² da Cusa"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Bruno, Giordano"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Tedesco"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910346734903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Yuhei Nishimura"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Drug Repositioning: Current Advances and Future Perspectives"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Frontiers Media SA, 2019"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (153 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Frontiers Research Topics"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Pharmacology"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Drug repositioning is the process of identifying new indications for existing drugs. At present, the conventional de novo drug discovery process requires an average of about 14 years and US$2.5 billion to approve and launch a drug. Drug repositioning can reduce the time and cost of this process because it takes advantage of drugs already in clinical use for other indications or drugs that have cleared phase I safety trials but have failed to show efficacy in the intended diseases. Historically, drug repositioning has been realized through serendipitous clinical observations or improved understanding of disease mechanisms. However, recent technological advances have enabled a more systematic approach to drug repositioning. This eBook collects 16 articles from 112 authors, providing readers with current advances and future perspectives of drug repositioning."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910220077903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Paul Christopher <1971->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"What works best when building partner capacity and under what circumstances? / / Christopher Paul [et al.]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"RAND Corporation, 2013"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Santa Monica, CA : , : RAND National Defense Research Institute, 2013"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-8330-8315-5"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (xxiv, 101 pages) : illustrations"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"355/.0320973"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Military assistance, American"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Nation-building"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Military & Naval Science"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Law, Politics & Government"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Armies"]
[{"$nulls":4},"United States Armed Forces Stability operations Case studies"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"This research was ... conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute\"--Preface"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Introduction: find the right ladder, find the right rung U.S. Department of Defense efforts to build partner capacity Hypotheses and factors: what works best for building partner capacity, and under what circumstances? Historical cases and case selection Analyses and results Conclusions and recommendation sAppendix: Subordinate factors for the modified DSART BPC objectives"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The United States has a long history of helping other nations develop and improve their military and other security forces. However, changing economic realities and the ongoing reductions in overall defense spending related to the end of more than a decade of war will affect the funding available for these initiatives. How can the U.S. Department of Defense increase the effectiveness of its efforts to build partner capacity while also increasing the efficiency of those efforts? And what can the history of U.S. efforts to build partner capacity reveal about which approaches are likely to be more or less effective under different circumstances? To tackle these complex questions and form a base of evidence to inform policy discussions and investment decisions, a "]
[{"$nulls":4},"RAND study collected and compared 20 years of data on 29 historical case studies of U.S. involvement in building partner capacity. In the process, it tested a series of validating factors and hypotheses (many of which are rooted in \"common knowledge\") to determine how they stand up to real-world case examples of partner capacity building. The results reveal nuances in outcomes and context, pointing to solutions and recommendations to increase the effectiveness of current and future U.S. initiatives to forge better relationships, improve the security and stability of partner countries, and meet U.S. policy and security objectives worldwide."]