{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":35,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":35,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,17,3],[18,2,18,3],[20,2,20,3],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[24,4,24,5],[25,2,25,3],[25,4,25,5],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[30,2,30,3],[31,2,31,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9911019126503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Galwey N. W"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The False Discovery Rate : Its Meaning, Interpretation and Application in Data Science"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Newark : , : John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, , 2024"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2024"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9781119889809"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1119889804"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9781119889786"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1119889782"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9781119889793"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1119889790"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (281 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Statistics in Practice Series"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"519.5/6"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Statistical hypothesis testing"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Mathematical statistics"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Preface and Acknowledgement -- About the Companion Website -- Chapter 1 Introduction --   1.1 A Brief History of Multiple Testing --   1.2 Outline of the Book --   1.3 Summary --   References -- Chapter 2 The Meaning of the False Discovery Rate (FDR) --   2.1 True Hypothesis Versus Conclusion from Evidence: The Confusion Matrix --   2.2 The Meaning of the p-Value --   2.3 The Meaning of the FDR: Its Relationship to the Confusion Matrix and the p-Value --   2.4 Control of the FDR While Minimising False-Negative Results: The Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) Criterion --   2.5 Graphical Illustration of the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR Criterion --   2.6 Use of the Q-Q Plot in Other Contexts --   2.7 Alternatives to the BH Criterion --   2.8 Consequences of Correlations Among the Hypotheses Tested --   2.9 The FDR in a Non-Statistical Context: A Diagnostic Test --   2.10 Summary --   References -- Chapter 3 Graphical Presentation of the FDR --   3.1 Presentation of the Q-Q Plot on the -log10(p) Scale --   3.2 Association of the BH-FDR with Individual p-Values --   3.3 Distinctive Plotting Symbols for Plotting of BH-FDR Values --   3.4 Non-Monotonicity of the BH-FDR: Detection of Correlation Among p-Values from the -"]
[{"$nulls":4},"log10-Transformed Q-Q Plot --   3.5 Summary"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"By this time, such significance tests had become the mainstay of statistical data analysis in the biological and social sciences - a status that they still retain. However, it was apparent from the outset that there are conceptual problems associated with such tests. Firstly, the test does not address precisely the question that the researcher most wants to answer. The researcher is not primarily interested in the probability of their data set - in a sense its probability is irrelevant, as it is an event that has actually happened. What they really want to know is the probability of the hypothesis that the experiment was designed to test. This is the problem of 'inverse' or 'Bayesian' probability, the probability of things that are not - and cannot be - observed. Secondly, although the probability that a single experiment will give a significant result by coincidence is low, if more tests are conducted, the probability that at least one of them will do so increases\"--"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910220059203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Bernard J. Baars"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Frontiers Media SA, 2016"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (166 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Frontiers Research Topics"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Psychology"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","A recent wave of brain research has advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of conscious states, contents and functions. A host of questions remain to be explored, as shown by lively debates between models of higher vs. lower-order aspects of consciousness, as well as global vs. local models. (Baars 2007; Block, 2009; Dennett and Cohen, 2011; Lau and Rosenthal, 2011). Over some twenty-five centuries the contemplative traditions have also developed explicit descriptions and taxonomies of the mind, to interpret experiences that are often reported in contemplative practices (Radhakrishnan & Moore, 1967; Rinbochay & Naper, 1981). These traditional descriptions sometimes converge on current scientific debates, such as the question of conceptual vs. non-conceptual consciousness; reflexivity or \"self-knowing\" associated with consciousness; the sense of self and consciousness; and aspects of consciousness that are said to continue during sleep. These real or claimed aspects of consciousness have not been fully integrated into scientific models so far. This Research Topic in Consciousness Research aims to provide a forum for theoretical proposals, new empirical findings, integrative literature reviews, and methodological improvements inspired by meditation-based models. We include a broad array of topics, including but not limited to: replicable findings from a variety of systematic mental practices; changes in brain functioning and organization that can be attributed to such practices; their effects on adaptation and neural plasticity; measurable effects on perception, cognition, affect and self-referential processes. We include contributions that address the question of causal attribution. Many published studies are correlational in nature, because "]
[{"$nulls":4},"of the inherent difficulty of conducting longitudinal experiments based on a major lifestyle decision, such as the decision to commit to a mental practice over a period of years. We also feature clinical and case studies, integrative syntheses and significant opinion articles."]