{"text_format":"5","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"props":{"last_modified_by":"sharecat"},"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":21,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[11,2,11,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[19,2,19,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910213816503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"DeJoy Nancy C. <1958->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Process This : Undergraduate Writing in Composition Studies / / Nancy C. DeJoy"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Logan : , : Utah State University Press, , 2004"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2004"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-28335-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613283351"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-87421-503-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (184 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"808/.042/0711"]
[{"$nulls":4},"808.0420711"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Report writing - Study and teaching (Higher)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"English language - Rhetoric - Study and teaching"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[{"$nulls":3},"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [161]-166) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"CONTENTS; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; INTRODUCTION; 1 REVISING PROCESS; 2 REVISING (RE)VISIONS; 3 REVISING INVENTION, ARRANGEMENT, AND REVISION; 4 REVISING CURRICULUM; 5 REVISING ENGLISH STUDIES; EPILOGUE; NOTES; REFERENCES; INDEX"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Sommario/riassunto","In Process This, Nancy DeJoy argues that even recent revisions to composition studies, cultural studies, service learning, and social process movements--continue to repress the subjects and methodologies that should be central, especially at the level of classroom practice. Designed to move student discourses beyond the classroom, these approaches nonetheless continue to position composition students (and teachers) as mere consumers of the discipline. This means that the subjects, methodologies, and theory/practice relationships that define the field are often absent in composition cla"]