{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":23,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,17,3],[18,2,18,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910154588603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"LaFollette Hugh <1948->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Brute science : dilemmas of animal experimentation / / Hugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London : , : Routledge, , 2016"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-00-306000-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-134-79026-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-138-98798-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-003-06000-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-367-08768-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-415-13113-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-203-98112-X"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (299 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Philosophical issues in science"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"179/.4"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Animal experimentation - Social aspects"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Animal experimentation - Moral and ethical aspects"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Originally published: 1997."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Brute Science investigates whether biomedical research using animals is, in fact, scientifically justified. Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks examine the issues in scientific terms using the models that scientists themselves use. They argue that we need to reassess our use of animals and, indeed, rethink the standard positions in the debate."]