{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":50,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":50,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,4,3,5],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[13,2,13,3],[13,4,13,5],[14,2,14,3],[14,4,14,5],[15,2,15,3],[15,4,15,5],[16,2,16,3],[18,2,18,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[33,2,33,3],[35,2,35,3],[35,4,35,5],[36,2,36,3],[36,4,36,5],[37,2,37,3],[38,2,38,3],[42,2,42,3],[43,2,43,3],[44,2,44,3],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA990001852880403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Partito Nazionale Fascista : . Federazione laziale-sabina : . Gruppo di competenza per l'agricoltura"]
[null,null,"Titolo"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Relazione sugli usi civici e le università agrarie del Lazio"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Roma : La Poligrafica Nazionale, 1923"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"22 p. ; 23 cm"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"343.076"]
[null,null,"Locazione",null,"FAGBC"]
[null,null,"Collocazione",null,"60 MISC. B 82/17"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","In testa al front.: Partito nazionale fascista, Federazione laziale-sabina, Gruppo di competenza per l'agricoltura"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910780560803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Braybrooke David"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Natural law modernized / / David Braybrooke"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Toronto, [Ontario] ; ; Buffalo, [New York] ; ; London, [England] : , : University of Toronto Press, , 2001"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2001"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-282-01451-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612014512"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4426-7758-9"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[2nd ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (366 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Toronto Studies in Philosophy"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"340.112"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Natural law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Natural law - History"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Includes index."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- 1. Did Medieval Natural Law Die Out? -- 2. Locke's Natural Law and St Thomas's: Secular in Content, Empirical in Foundation -- 3. Rousseau and St Thomas on the Common Good -- 4. Hobbes Allied with St Thomas: An Axiomatic System of Laws -- 5. David Hume: Natural Law Theorist and Moral Realist -- 6. From Private Property in Hume and Locke to the Universality of Natural Laws -- 7. With Us Still: Natural Law Theory Illustrated Today in the Work of David Copp -- 8. Moral Education -- 9. Epilogue: The Lasting Strength of Natural Law Theory in Jurisprudence -- Appendix: Natural Law in Philosophical Traditions outside the Christian West -- Notes -- Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Braybrooke challenges received scholarly opinion by arguing that canonical theorists Hobbes, Locke, Hume, and Rousseau took St Thomas Aquinas as their point of reference, reinforcing rather than departing from his natural law theory.\"--JSTOR website (viewed March 8, 2017)."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910140895103321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"[Place of publication not identified], : IEEE, 2010"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9781424462629"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1424462622"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9781424462605"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1424462606"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"607.1"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Technical education"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","For many years the authors have coordinated a large engineering design subject, having a cohort of approximately 300+ students. Lectures are supported by tutorials of approximately 32 students which incorporate collaborative team learning activities and project-based learning. Each tutor is responsible for grading the assessment tasks for students in their tutorial. A common issue is how to achieve a consistent standard of marking between different tutors. To address this issue the authors have used a number of methods including double-blind marking and remarking to support consistent grading. Despite mainly finding only small variations between the grading of different tutors a number of students still complained about a perceived lack of consistency. We theorised that differences in the feedback provided by tutors was a contributing factor to this perception. In this paper we report investigating this theory and finding that while students' perception of difference in grading were not unfounded, the problem was exacerbated by inconsistencies in the language tutors use when providing feedback."]