{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910140123503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Descola Philippe"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Anthropology of nature [[electronic resource] ] : inaugural lecture delivered on Thursday 2 March 2001 / / Philippe Descola"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Collège de France, 2014"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Paris, France : , : Collège de France, , 2014"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2722602822 (ebook)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9782722602823 (ebook)"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (36 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Leçons inaugurales du Collège de France"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Anthropology"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Social sciences"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[{"$nulls":4},"This text has been translated by Liz Libbrecht in collaboration with Céline Surprenant (Collège de France)."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","It looks as though the anthropology of nature is an oxymoron of sorts, given that for the past few centuries, nature has been characterized in the West by humans’ absence, and humans, by their capacity to overcome what is natural in them. But nature does not exist as a sphere of autonomous realities for all peoples. By positing a universal distribution of humans and non-humans in two separate ontological fields, we are for one quite ill equipped to analyse all those systems of objectification of the world in which a formal distinction between nature and culture does not obtain. This type of distinction moreover appears to go against what the evolutionary and life sciences have taught us about the phyletic continuity of organisms. Our singularity in relation to all other existents is relative, as is our awareness of it."]