{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910137467403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Hansbury Elise"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Le juge interaméricain et le jus cogens"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Graduate Institute Publications, 2011"]
[{"$nulls":4},"[Place of publication not identified], : Graduate Institute Publications, 2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2-940415-89-7"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (110 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"eCahiers de l'Institut ; ; 11"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"International Law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Law, Politics & Government"]
[{"$nulls":4},"International Law - General"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","La communauté internationale s’est dotée du jus cogens sans lui conférer un contenu déterminé, laissant aux juridictions internationales le soin de déterminer le contenu substantif des normes impératives. Alors que la Cour internationale de Justice ne semble pas avoir embrassé ce rôle, la Cour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme a développé  une méthode d’interprétation entièrement axée sur la protection de la personne humaine, qui l’a inéluctablement menée à conférer un contenu au  jus cogens. La Cour a mis sur pied un système cohérent de droits et d’obligations, au sommet duquel se situent les droits impératifs, dont la sanction entraine la responsabilité aggravée de l’État. Plusieurs facteurs ont contribué à cette activité jurisprudentielle innovante que la présente étude analyse. Il importe de voir cependant si le discours universaliste de la Cour basé sur l’unicité de la personne humaine est susceptible de contribuer à l’édification d’un jus cogens réellement universel.  Prix Mariano Garcia Rubio 2010 du meilleur mémoire de Master en droit international.  The adoption of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in 1969 introduced the concept of jus cogens into the realm of the international legal order. The international community of States nevertheless decided to leave the determination of its substantive content to international Courts. While the International Court of Justice appears to have been reluctant to perform such a function, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights "]
[{"$nulls":4},"has developed a creative and dynamic method of interpretation intended to afford a full and complete protection to human beings; such an approach resulted inevitably in the identification of the content of peremptory norms. The Inter-American Court has therefore established a coherent system of rights and obligations where violations of jus cogens norms leads to the aggravated responsibility of the defendant State. The aim of this study is, on the one hand, to identify the factors…"]