{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[8,2,8,3],[8,4,8,5],[9,2,9,3],[9,4,9,5],[10,2,10,3],[10,4,10,5],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[31,2,31,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNICAMPANIAVAN0279339"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Marinoschi, Gabriela"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Dual Variational Approach to Nonlinear Diffusion Equations / Gabriela Marinoschi"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cham, : Birkhäuser, : Springer, 2023"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"xviii, 212 p. : ill. ; 24 cm"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910136612903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Stark Findlay"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Culpable carelessness : recklessness and negligence in the criminal law / / Findlay Stark"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2016"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-316-77176-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-316-81092-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-316-81101-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-108-46512-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-85594-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-316-81110-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-316-81146-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-316-81119-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"LAW026000"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"345/.04"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Negligence, Criminal"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Criminal intent"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Criminal law"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017)."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Half-title                 ; Title page                 ; Copyright information; Dedication                 ; Table of contents                        ; Acknowledgements                       ; List of Abbreviations                            ; Table of Cases                     ; Table of Legislation                           ; 1 Introduction                     ; An Overview of the Argument                                  ; Risks and Wrongdoing                           ; Why Is Justification Required?"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Justifying Risk-taking                             2 The Doctrinal Trend towards the Standard Account                                                         ; England and Wales                        ; Negligence                 ; Voluntary Intoxication                             ; Summary              ; Canada             ; Voluntary Intoxication                             ; Summary              ; Australia                ; The Common Law Jurisdictions                                   ; The Older Codes                      ; The Modern Codes"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Voluntary Intoxication in the Codified Jurisdictions                                                           Summary              ; The United States                        ; The MPC's Definitions                            ; Virtually Full Adoption of the MPC's "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Definitions                                                       ; Virtually Full Adoption of the MPC's Definitions with Different Labels                                                                             ; Adoption of the MPC's Definitions, with Edits"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Partial Adoption of the MPC's Definitions                                                Non-adoption of the MPC's Definitions                                            ; No General Definitions                             ; Voluntary Intoxication                             ; Summary              ; New Zealand                  ; Summary              ; Scotland               ; Voluntary Intoxication                             ; Summary              ; Conclusion                 ; 3 Consistency in Definition"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Defending Multiple Definitions                                     An Alternative Approach                              ; Duff on Communication                            ; The Boundaries of Definition                                   ; Robinson on Conduct and Adjudication                                           ; 'Thin Ice' and Discretion                                ; Practical Concerns                         ; A Criminalisation Concern                                ; An Over-inclusiveness Concern                                    ; Conclusion"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4 From Awareness to Belief"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law."]