{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910132726203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Charest Paul"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"La prise en charge donne-t-elle du pouvoir? : l'exemple des Atikamekw et des Montagnais / / Paul Charest"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Chicoutimi, Quebec : , : J.-M. Tremblay, , 2010"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4123-6925-8"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Classiques des sciences sociales ; ; 4274"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"971.4004973"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Montagnais Indians"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Introduction -- Prise en charge, pouvoir, autonomie -- Les grandes étapes de la prise en charge -- La prise en charge par les Atikamekw et les Montagnais du Québec -- La prise en charge de l'éducation -- La prise en charge du développement économique -- Quel pouvoir ? -- Références."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Après avoir défini la notion de pouvoir, cet article traite d'abord du processus de délégation de pouvoirs administratifs aux communautés amérindiennes par le ministère des Affaires indiennes du Canada. Dans une deuxième partie, la prise en charge est illustrée par le cas des nations Atikamekw et montagnaise (ou innu) qui s'y sont engagées dans le milieu des années soixante-dix par la création de différentes associations et corporations. Les domaines de l'éducation et du développement économique servent d'exemples pour clarifier les acquis et les difficultés rencontrées. En fait, il existe une contradiction fondamentale dans la politique du gouvernement canadien à l'égard des Amérindiens : le ministère des Affaires indiennes demeure responsable devant le Parlement de la gestion des programmes et de l'utilisation des fonds destinés aux Indiens, alors que la délégation de pouvoirs administratifs est considérée par ces derniers comme une forme d'autonomie visant à réduire, sinon à abolir, la tutelle fédérale. Dans le contexte d'échec du projet d'accord constitutionnel qui aurait reconnu le droit inhérent des autochtones à l'autonomie gouvernementale, l'étape de la prise en charge ne laisse aux organisations amérindiennes qu'un simple pouvoir de gestion."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Following a definition of the concept of power, this paper first discusses the process of the devolution of administrative powers to Indian communities by the Department of Indian Affairs. In a second "]
[{"$nulls":4},"part, this process is exemplified by the case of the Atikamekw and Montagnais (or Innu) Nations which followed this path in the middle of the 70's creating various associations and corporations. The sectors of education and economic development are also used to demonstrate the success and the difficulties of their enterprise. In fact, there exists a basic contradiction in the Canadian policy regarding Indian peoples : the Department of Indian Affairs is responsible before the Canadian Parliament for the programs and the funds regarding the Indians, whereas the devolution of administrative powers is considered by them as a recognition of their autonomy leading to the reduction, if not the abolition, of the federal tutelage. In the context of an inconsistent policy and the recent [76] failure of the Constitutional Agreement Project confirming the inherent right of the Aboriginal people to self-government, the take over stage does not give a real decisional power but only a managerial one to the Indian organisations."]