{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[13,2,13,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910132592103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Bélanger Paul R."]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Éléments théoriques pour une sociologie de l'entreprise : des classiques aux \"néo-classiques\" / / Paul R. Bélanger, Benoît Lévesque"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Chicoutimi, Quebec : , : J.-M. Tremblay, , [2008]"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4123-6521-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Éléments théoriques pour une sociologie de l'entreprise ; ; 3444"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"338.74"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Corporations - Sociological aspects"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"a table des matières de l'article; Résumé / Summary / Resumen."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Dans cet article, les auteurs tentent de caractériser la façon dont les classiques de la sociologie (Durkheim, Weber et Marx) et les auteurs contemporains qui s'en inspirent définissent l'entreprise. Ils montrent ainsi comment chacune de ces traditions sociologiques met l'accent sur l'une ou l'autre des dimensions que sont les rapports sociaux, la dimension institutionnelle, la dimension organisationnelle. Ces dimensions sont cependant présentées par chacune de ces approches comme objets isolés, légitimes certes, mais non articulés. S'inspirant à la fois de l'approche des mouvements sociaux et de l'école de la régulation, les auteurs proposent de transformer ces différentes perspectives en dimensions ou niveaux d'analyse d'une perspective plus large où chacune des dimensions constitue un enjeu propre, ses propres acteurs, sa propre culture. En conclusion, ils expliquent pourquoi, selon les époques, une approche plutôt que l'autre s'est imposée."]
[{"$nulls":4},"In this paper, the authors attempt to identify the manner in which both classical sociologists (Durkheim, Weber and Marx), and recent authors they have influenced, characterize the firm. In so doing, they demonstrate how each sociological tradition stresses a different dimension, be it the institutional and organizational dimensions or social relationships. The authors maintain that while each dimension is certainly legitimate, the links between them have not been explored and they remain isolated from one another. Therefore, drawing simultaneously on models provided by the social movements approach and the theory of regulation, the authors suggest that these different dimensions be transformed into levels of analysis with broader "]
[{"$nulls":4},"perspectives. Each new level would encompass specific concerns, actors, values and beliefs."]
[{"$nulls":4},"En este artículo, los autores intentan caracterizar la manera en que los clásicos de la sociología (Durkheim, Weber y Marx) y los autores contemporáneos inspirados por ellos definen la empresa. Muestran así cómo cada una de esas tradiciones sociológicas enfatiza una u otra de las siguientes dimensiones: las relaciones sociales, la dimensión institucional o bien la dimensión organizativa. Sin embargo tales dimensiones son presentadas por cada una de estas visiones como objetos aislados, legítimos en sí mismos pero no articulados. Inspirándose a la vez de la Sociología de los movimientos sociales y de la Escuela de la regulación, los autores proponen transformar estas perspectivas diferentes en dimensiones o niveles de análisis dentro de una visión más amplia donde cada una de las dimensiones constituya una cuestión propia, con sus propios actores y su propia cultura. Palabras claves: empresa, organización, institución, organización del trabajo, modernización, cultura de empresa, relaciones sociales, movimientos sociales."]