{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910131761803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Descola Philippe"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Anthropologie de la nature : leçon inaugurale faite le jeudi 29 mars 2001 / / Philippe Descola"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Collège de France, 2001"]
[{"$nulls":4},"France : , : Collège de France, , 2001"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9782722602199"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9782722600614"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (36 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Leçons inaugurales du Collège de France ; ; 159"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Anthropology"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Social Sciences"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Anthropology - General"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In appearance, the anthropology of nature is a sort of oxymoron since, for several centuries in the West, nature has been characterized by the absence of man, and man by what he has been able to overcome naturally. in him. But nature does not exist as a sphere of autonomous realities for all peoples. By postulating a universal distribution of humans and non-humans in two separate ontological domains, we are poorly equipped to analyse all those systems of objectification of the world where a formal distinction between nature and culture is absent. Such a distinction appears, moreover, to go against what the evolutionary and life sciences have taught us about the phyletic continuity of organisms."]