{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910131228603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Chartier Denis"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"ONG internationales environnementalistes et politiques forestières tropicales : l'exemple de Greenpeace en Amazonie / / Denis Chartier"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Chicoutimi : , : J.-M. Tremblay, , 2007"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4123-5795-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (31 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Classiques des sciences sociales"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"333.7"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Environment"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Table des matières de l'article; Résumé; Introduction; Bibliographie."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","L'analyse critique de la campagne de Greenpeace consacrée à la protection de l'Amazonie, entre le milieu des années 1990 et le début des années 2000, révèle l'impact contradictoire des ONG internationales sur les politiques forestières tropicales. D'un côté, l'ONG participe avec succès au maintien sur les agendas nationaux et internationaux de la question de la bonne gestion des forêts tropicales. Elle réussit aussi à apporter une aide conséquente à certaines populations locales, tout en étant l'un des principaux promoteurs de nouveaux concepts, de nouvelles normes et de nouvelles politiques. De l'autre, certaines logiques internes entraînent des choix stratégiques qui conduisent Greenpeace à engager et porter des normes et des représentations n'intégrant pas toujours la complexité inhérente aux milieux forestiers tropicaux. Cela peut amenuiser les débats visant à mettre à jour les meilleurs modes de conservation et de gestion de ces espaces forestiers. Ces dynamiques peuvent aussi produire les effets inverses de ceux qui sont escomptés."]
[{"$nulls":4},"A critical analysis of Greenpeace's conservation campaign in Amazonia, from the mid 1990s to today reveals the contradictory impact of international NGOs on tropical forest policies. On one hand, Greenpeace succeeds in maintaining the question of tropical forest management on national and international political agendas. The organisation also contributes by providing a substantial aid to local populations, whilst being at the forefront of new concepts and norms in local participation and promoting new policies. On the other hand, internal logics induce strategic decision-making which, at times, leads Greenpeace to adopt norms and representations that do not always "]
[{"$nulls":4},"adequately represent the complexity inherent to tropical forest environments. This in turn can restrict debates concerning appropriate conservation modalities and the management of forest spaces. Such dynamics can also produce contrary effects to those desired."]
[{"$nulls":4},"El análisis de la campaña de Greenpeace consagrada a la protección de la Amazonía, entre mediados de los años 1990 y principios de los años 2000, muestra el impacto contradictorio de las ONG internacionales sobre las políticas forestales tropicales. Por un lado, la ONG participa con éxito al mantenimiento de la cuestión de la buena gestión de los bosques tropicales en las agendas nacionales e internacionales. Esta organización logra asimismo aportar la ayuda requerida por ciertas poblaciones locales, sin perder su rol de promotor de nuevos conceptos, nuevas normas y nuevas políticas. Por otra parte, ciertas dinámicas internas inducen decisiones estratégicas que conducen a Greenpeace a comprometerse y promover normas y representaciones que no siempre integran la complejidad inherente a los medios forestales tropicales. Eso puede simplificar los debates que tratan de actualizar los mejores modos de conservación y de gestión de los espacios forestales. Estas dinámicas pueden asimismo producir efectos contrarios a lo que se buscan."]