LEADER 01132cam2 22003133 450 001 SON0004472 005 20250204150117.0 010 $a8802048584 100 $a20010209d1994 |||||ita|0103 ba 101 $aita 102 $aIT 200 1 $a<<4: >>Società a responsablità limitata$fE.Licheri$gDisciplina fiscale, di L. Anselmi, S. Marchese 210 $aTorino$cUTET$d1994 215 $aIX, 520 p.$d24 cm 225 2 $aDiritto e Realtà 410 1$1001LAEC00017530$12001 $a*Diritto e Realtà 461 1$1001SOBE00082019$12000 $a<>società: Ordinamento e variabili 700 1$aLicheri$b, Eugenio$3AF00009230$4070$0279822 702 1$aMarchese, Stefano$3AF00019058$4070 702 1$aAnselmi, Lorenzo$3SOBA00032424$4070 801 0$aIT$bUNISOB$c20250204$gRICA 850 $aUNISOB 852 $aUNISOB$j340|Coll|29|K$m95324 912 $aSON0004472 940 $aM 102 Monografia moderna SBN 941 $aM 957 $a340|Coll|29|K$b000004$gSI$d95324$rACQUISTO$1Spinosa$2UNISOB$3UNISOB$420221017073507.0$520240125110544.0$6Alfano 996 $aSocietà a responsablità limitata$94313972 997 $aUNISOB LEADER 02843nam 2200601Ia 450 001 9910960366903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9781593327057 010 $a1593327056 035 $a(CKB)2670000000341078 035 $a(EBL)1128633 035 $a(OCoLC)831120728 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000856086 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11440451 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000856086 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10804896 035 $a(PQKB)11597078 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1128633 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1128633 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10677869 035 $a(Perlego)2024075 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000341078 100 $a20130211d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEstimating drug use $ethe effect of sampling methods and policy implications /$fJanine Kremling 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aEl Paso $cLFB Scholarly Publishing LLC$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (202 p.) 225 0 $aCriminal justice: recent scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9781593325190 311 08$a1593325193 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aList of tables -- List of figures -- Overview of the duf and adam program : understanding the problem -- Why is it important to study illicit drug use? -- DUF and ADAM program : criticism and transition from a the convenience to a probability sample -- Data description and analytical strategy -- Results of the equivalence analysis : assessing the impact of sampling procedures -- Discussion and conclusion -- Appendices -- References -- Index. 330 $aKremling uses data from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) and the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs to explore whether the drug estimates of DUF, using a non-probability sample, and the drug use estimates of ADAM, using a probability sample, yield different results. She finds that the drug use information in DUF and ADAM is not substantially different for marijuana, cocaine, and opiates for all sites analyzed together. Her main conclusion is that a probability sample does not produce results that are substantially different from a convenience sample. While a researcher can attempt to 410 0$aCriminal Justice: Recent Scholarship 606 $aDrug abuse$xResearch$zUnited States 606 $aSubstance abuse$zUnited States$xResearch 615 0$aDrug abuse$xResearch 615 0$aSubstance abuse$xResearch. 676 $a362.29/120973 700 $aKremling$b Janine$f1977-$01813404 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910960366903321 996 $aEstimating drug use$94366493 997 $aUNINA