LEADER 04116nam 2200745 a 450 001 9910462339303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-674-06110-1 024 7 $a10.4159/harvard.9780674061101 035 $a(CKB)2670000000233591 035 $a(EBL)3301116 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000721599 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11384242 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000721599 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10693905 035 $a(PQKB)11558423 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3301116 035 $a(DE-B1597)178240 035 $a(OCoLC)804851762 035 $a(OCoLC)840446555 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674061101 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3301116 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10583974 035 $a(OCoLC)923119506 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000233591 100 $a20101123d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aReasoning from race$b[electronic resource] $efeminism, law, and the civil rights revolution /$fSerena Mayeri 210 $aCambridge, Mass. $cHarvard University Press$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (382 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-674-04759-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aThe rebirth of race-sex analogies -- "Women and minorities" -- Recession, reaction, retrenchment -- Reasoning from sex -- Lost intersections -- The late civil rights era. 330 $aInformed in 1944 that she was "not of the sex" entitled to be admitted to Harvard Law School, African American activist Pauli Murray confronted the injustice she called "Jane Crow." In the 1960's and 1970's, the analogies between sex and race discrimination pioneered by Murray became potent weapons in the battle for women's rights, as feminists borrowed rhetoric and legal arguments from the civil rights movement. Serena Mayeri's Reasoning from Race is the first book to explore the development and consequences of this key feminist strategy. Mayeri uncovers the history of an often misunderstood connection at the heart of American antidiscrimination law. Her study details how a tumultuous political and legal climate transformed the links between race and sex equality, civil rights and feminism. Battles over employment discrimination, school segregation, reproductive freedom, affirmative action, and constitutional change reveal the promise and peril of reasoning from race-and offer a vivid picture of Pauli Murray, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and others who defined feminists' agenda. Looking beneath the surface of Supreme Court opinions to the deliberations of feminist advocates, their opponents, and the legal decision makers who heard-or chose not to hear-their claims, Reasoning from Race showcases previously hidden struggles that continue to shape the scope and meaning of equality under the law. 606 $aSex discrimination against women$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aWomen's rights$zUnited States$xPhilosophy 606 $aFeminist jurisprudence$zUnited States 606 $aWomen's rights$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aCivil rights movements$zUnited States 606 $aWomen$xLegal status, laws, etc$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aConstitutional law$zUnited States$xMethodology 606 $aFeminist theory$zUnited States 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aSex discrimination against women$xLaw and legislation$xHistory 615 0$aWomen's rights$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aFeminist jurisprudence 615 0$aWomen's rights$xHistory 615 0$aCivil rights movements 615 0$aWomen$xLegal status, laws, etc.$xHistory 615 0$aConstitutional law$xMethodology. 615 0$aFeminist theory 676 $a342.7308/78 700 $aMayeri$b Serena$01012975 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462339303321 996 $aReasoning from race$92353899 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00888nam a22002411i 4500 001 991004158679707536 005 20030131124714.0 008 020819s1984 it |||||||||||||||||ita 035 $ab11925917-39ule_inst 035 $aocm00000003$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Filologia Ling. e Lett.$bita$cA.t.i. Arché s.c.r.l. Pandora Sicilia s.r.l. 100 1 $aBalsamo, Luigi$0117673 245 13$aLa bibliografia :$bstoria di una tradizione /$cLuigi Balsamo 260 $aFirenze :$bSansoni,$c1984 300 $a163 p. ;$c24 cm 490 0 $aManuali Sansoni 650 4$aBibliografia$xStoria 907 $a.b11925917$b28-04-17$c01-04-03 912 $a991004158679707536 945 $aLE008 Cr M IV 37$g1$i2008000234256$lle008$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u7$v0$w7$x0$y.i12197580$z01-04-03 996 $aBibliografia$9466653 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale008$b01-04-03$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h3$i1 LEADER 02312nam 2200577 a 450 001 9910789776903321 005 20230721014342.0 010 $a0-567-17221-X 010 $a1-283-19582-8 010 $a9786613195821 010 $a0-567-29937-6 035 $a(CKB)2670000000107021 035 $a(EBL)743032 035 $a(OCoLC)745866698 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000524732 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12179462 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000524732 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10486767 035 $a(PQKB)10000255 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC743032 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000107021 100 $a20110912d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPaul's critique of theocracy$b[electronic resource] $ea theocracy in Corinthians and Galations /$fDavid Odell-Scott 210 $aLondon $cT&T Clark$d2009 215 $a1 online resource (201 p.) 225 1 $aLibrary of New Testament studies 225 0 $aT&T Clark biblical studies 300 $aPaperback edition 2009. 311 $a0-567-28335-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $apt. 1. De/constructing the church -- pt. 2. De-secration. 330 $aPaul's Critique of Theocracy offers an interpretation of select texts in Corinthians and Galatians concerned with the establishment of legitimate authority in the Christian community. Odell-Scott argues that for Paul, no one may boast that they are selected by God, and no one has the authority to rule as God's representative. Paul also criticizes those who exhibit a superior "sacredness" over other community members. Contrary to most scholarly views, Odell-Scott argues that Paul is not taking sides in a debate about the proper authority structure. Rather, he criticizes any notion of such a str 410 0$aLibrary of New Testament studies. 606 $aTheocracy 606 $aSociology, Biblical 615 0$aTheocracy. 615 0$aSociology, Biblical. 676 $a227/.206 700 $aOdell-Scott$b David$01478108 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910789776903321 996 $aPaul's critique of theocracy$93693683 997 $aUNINA