LEADER 02757nam 22006134a 450 001 9910456662803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-59332-544-4 035 $a(CKB)2550000000035463 035 $a(EBL)837738 035 $a(OCoLC)732955807 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000553357 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11341335 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000553357 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10504757 035 $a(PQKB)11241941 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC837738 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL837738 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10430497 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000035463 100 $a20090604d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDeath by jury$b[electronic resource] $egroup dynamics and capital sentencing /$fNadine M. Connell 210 $aEl Paso $cLFB Scholarly Pub.$d2009 215 $a1 online resource (224 p.) 225 1 $aCriminal justice 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-334-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 197-207) and index. 327 $aThe death penalty and discretion in America -- The role of the jury -- Understanding groups in context -- Measuring groups with the capital jury project -- Testing group dynamics -- What juries do : putting it all together. 330 $aConnell focuses on the role that deliberation has on the juror's perception of group functioning, measured here by the construct of group climate. Her results suggest individual juror characteristics do not have a direct effect on sentencing outcomes; rather, the level of group climate acts as a mediating variable between individual characteristics and outcomes. Trial level characteristics directly predict sentencing and indirectly operate through the level of group climate. Group climate is the strongest predictor of outcomes, with juries who have more positive perceptions of group climate mo 410 0$aCriminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) 606 $aCapital punishment$zUnited States 606 $aVerdicts$zUnited States 606 $aJury$zUnited States$xDecision making$xEvaluation 606 $aDiscrimination in criminal justice administration$zUnited States 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCapital punishment 615 0$aVerdicts 615 0$aJury$xDecision making$xEvaluation. 615 0$aDiscrimination in criminal justice administration 676 $a345.73/0773 700 $aConnell$b Nadine M.$f1979-$0990816 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910456662803321 996 $aDeath by jury$92267138 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00982nam a22002531i 4500 001 991003736419707536 005 20040601154026.0 008 040802s1929 it |||||||||||||||||ita 035 $ab13119709-39ule_inst 035 $aARCHE-107231$9ExL 040 $aBiblioteca Interfacoltà$bita$cA.t.i. Arché s.c.r.l. Pandora Sicilia s.r.l. 082 04$a944.0509 100 1 $aRuini, Meuccio$069531 245 10$aLuigi Corvetto genovese :$bministro e restauratore delle finanze di Francia, 1756-1821 /$cMeuccio Ruini 260 $aBari :$bLaterza,$c1929 300 $a365 p. ;$c21 cm 440 0$aBiblioteca di cultura moderna 650 4$aCorvetto, Luigi 907 $a.b13119709$b02-04-14$c05-08-04 912 $a991003736419707536 945 $aLE002 Fondo Giudici P 1678$g1$iLE002G-15412$lle002$nC. 1$o-$pE0.00$q-$rn$so $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i13755213$z05-08-04 996 $aLuigi Corvetto genovese$9308217 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale002$b05-08-04$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h0$i1 LEADER 04491nam 2200433z- 450 001 9910137095003321 005 20210212 035 $a(CKB)3710000000824716 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/59221 035 $a(oapen)doab59221 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000824716 100 $a20202102d2015 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aSense of agency: Examining awareness of the acting self 210 $cFrontiers Media SA$d2015 215 $a1 online resource (238 p.) 225 1 $aFrontiers Research Topics 311 08$a2-88919-624-0 330 $aThe sense of agency is defined as the sense of oneself as the agent of one's own actions. This also allows oneself to feel distinct from others, and contributes to the subjective phenomenon of self-consciousness (Gallagher, 2000). Distinguishing oneself from others is arguably one of the most important functions of the human brain. Even minor impairments in this ability profoundly affect the individual's functioning in society as demonstrated by psychiatric and neurological syndromes involving agency disturbances (Della Sala et al., 1991; Franck et al., 2001; Frith, 2005; Sirigu et al., 1999). But the sense of agency also plays a role for cultural and religious phenomena such as voodoo, superstition and gambling, in which individuals experience subjective control over objectively uncontrollable entities (Wegner, 2003). Furthermore, it plays into ethical and law questions concerning responsibility and guilt. For these reasons a better understanding of the sense of agency has been important for neuroscientists, clinicians, philosophers of mind and the general society alike. Significant progress has been made in this regard. For example, philosophical scrutiny has helped establish the conceptual boundaries of the sense of agency (Bayne, 2011; Gallagher, 2000, 2012; Pacherie 2008; Synofzik et al., 2008) and scientific investigations have shed light on the neurocognitive basis of sense of agency including the brain regions supporting sense of agency (Chambon et al., 2013; David et al., 2007; Farrer et al., 2003, 2008; Spengler et al., 2009; Tsakiris et al., 2010; Yomogida et al., 2010). Despite this progress there remain a number of outstanding questions such as: ? Are there cross-cultural differences in the sense of agency? ? How does the sense of agency develop in infants or change across the lifespan? ? How does social context influence sense of agency? ? What neural networks support sense of agency (i.e., connectivity and communication between brain regions)? ? What are the temporal dynamics with respect to neural processes underlying the sense of agency (i.e. the what and when of agency processing)? ? How can different cue models of the sense of agency be further specified and empirically supported, especially with regards to cue integration/ weighting? ? What are the applications of sense of agency research (clinically, engineering etc.)? The concept of the sense of agency offers intriguing avenues for knowledge transfer across disciplines and interdisciplinary empirical approaches, especially in addressing the afore-mentioned outstanding questions. The aim of the present research topic is to promote and facilitate such interdisciplinarity for a better understanding of why and how we typically experience our own actions so naturally and undoubtedly as "ours" and what goes awry when we do not. We, thus, welcome contributions from, for example, (i) neuroscience and psychology (including development psychology/ neuroscience), (ii) psychiatry and neurology, (iii) philosophy, (iv) robotics, and (v) computational modeling. In addition to empirical or scientific studies of the sense of agency, we also encourage theoretical contributions including reviews, models, and opinions. 517 $aSense of agency 606 $aNeurosciences$2bicssc 610 $aaction 610 $abayes 610 $aConsciousness 610 $aDisorders of agency 610 $asense of agency 610 $aVolition 615 7$aNeurosciences 700 $aSukhvinder Obhi$4auth$01331620 702 $aNicole David$4auth 702 $aJames W. Moore$4auth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910137095003321 996 $aSense of agency: Examining awareness of the acting self$93040505 997 $aUNINA