LEADER 01980nam a22003731i 4500 001 991002582399707536 005 20030910070429.0 008 030925s1945 it |||||||||||||||||lat 035 $ab12308985-39ule_inst 035 $aARCHE-035653$9ExL 040 $aBiblioteca Interfacoltà$bita$cA.t.i. Arché s.c.r.l. Pandora Sicilia s.r.l. 082 04$a473 100 1 $aForcellini, Egidio$0217173 245 10$aLexicon totius latinitatis /$cab Aegidio Forcellini, lucubratum deinde a Iosepho Furlanetto, emendatum et auctum nunc vero curantibus Francisco Corradini et Iosepho Perin emendatius et auctius melioremque in formam redactum 250 $aRist. anast. 260 $aPatavii :$bArnaldus Forni excudebat bononiae gregoriana edente,$c1945 300 $av. ;$c34 cm 500 $aRipr. facs. dell'ed.: Patavii, 1864-1926 650 4$aLingua latina$xDizionari 700 1 $aPerin, Joseph 700 1 $aFurlanetto, Giuseppe 700 1 $aCorradini, Francesco 907 $a.b12308985$b02-04-14$c08-10-03 912 $a991002582399707536 945 $aLE002 Enc. Ling. Cl. 1/II$cV. 2$g1$i2002000277923$lle002$on$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12704970$z08-10-03 945 $aLE002 SB 473 LEX 945 $aLE002 Enc. Ling. Cl. 1$g1$i2002000277916$lle002$o-$pE0.00$q-$rn$so $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12704982$z08-10-03 945 $aLE002 Enc. Ling. Cl. 1/III$cV. 3$g1$i2002000277930$lle002$on$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12704994$z08-10-03 945 $aLE002 Enc. Ling. Cl. 1/IV$cV. 4$g1$i2002000277947$lle002$on$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12705007$z08-10-03 945 $aLE002 Enc. Ling. Cl. 1/V$cV. 5$g1$i2002000277954$lle002$on$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12705019$z08-10-03 945 $aLE002 Enc. Ling. Cl. 1/VI$cV. 6$g1$i2002000277961$lle002$on$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12705020$z08-10-03 996 $aLexicon totius latinitatis$9162640 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale002$b08-10-03$cm$da $e-$flat$git $h0$i6 LEADER 04148nam 2200469z- 450 001 9910220059803321 005 20210211 035 $a(CKB)3800000000216180 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/48108 035 $a(oapen)doab48108 035 $a(EXLCZ)993800000000216180 100 $a20202102d2016 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aFrom Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought 210 $cFrontiers Media SA$d2016 215 $a1 online resource (187 p.) 225 1 $aFrontiers Research Topics 311 08$a9782889198962 311 08$a2889198960 330 $aIn the study of human thinking, two main research questions can be asked: "Descriptive Q: What is human thinking like? Normative Q: What ought human thinking be like?" For decades, these two questions have dominated the field, and the relationship between them generated many a controversy. Empirical normativist approaches regard the answers to these questions as positively correlated - in essence, human thinking is what it ought to be (although what counts as the 'ought' standard is moot). In contemporary theories of reasoning and decision making, this is often associated with a Panglossian framework, an adaptationist approach which regards human thinking as a priori rational. In contrast, prescriptive normativism sees the answers to these two questions as negatively correlated. Normative models are still relevant to human thought, but human behaviour deviates from them quite markedly (with the invited conclusion that humans are often irrational). Prescriptive normativism often results in a Meliorist agenda, which sees rationality as amenable to education. Both empirical and prescriptive normativism can be contrasted with a descriptivist framework for psychology of human thinking. Following Hume's strict divide between the 'is' and the 'ought', descriptivism regards the descriptive and normative research questions as uncorrelated, or dissociated, with only the former question suitable for psychological study of human behaviour. This basic division carries over to the relation between normative ('ought') rationality, based on conforming to normative standards; and instrumental ('is') rationality, based on achieving one's goals. Descriptivist approaches regard the two as dissociated, whereas normativist approaches tend to see them as closely linked, with normative arguments defining and justifying instrumental rationality. This research topic brings together diverse contributions to the continuing debate. Featuring contributions from leading researchers in the field, the e-book covers a wide range of subjects, arranged by six sections: The standard picture: Normativist perspectives In defence of soft normativism Exploring normative models Descriptivist perspectives Evolutionary and ecological accounts Empirical reports With a total of some 24 articles from 55 authors, this comprehensive treatment includes theoretical analyses, meta-theoretical critiques, commentaries, and a range of empirical reports. The contents of the Research Topic should appeal to psychologists, linguists, philosophers and cognitive scientists, with research interests in a wide range of domains, from language, through reasoning, judgment and decision making, and moral judgment, to epistemology and theory of mind, philosophical logic, and meta-ethics. 517 $aFrom Is to Ought 606 $aPsychology$2bicssc 610 $aBayesianism 610 $aIs-ought problem 610 $ameliorism 610 $amoral judgment 610 $anew paradigm 610 $anormative models 610 $anormativism 610 $aPanglossianism 610 $arationality 615 7$aPsychology 700 $aOver$b D. E.$f1946-,$4auth$00 702 $aElqayam$b Shira$4auth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220059803321 996 $aFrom Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought$94418745 997 $aUNINA