LEADER 00940nam a2200265 i 4500 001 991001750939707536 005 20020503153209.0 008 000505s1976 it ||| | ita 035 $ab10267645-39ule_inst 035 $aEXGIL90897$9ExL 040 $aBiblioteca Interfacoltà$bita 082 0 $a823.91 100 1 $aCain, James Mallahan$0465621 245 10$aAlla fine dell'arcobaleno :$bromanzo /$cJames M. Cain ; traduzione di Tilde Arcelli Riva 260 $aMilano :$bSonzogno,$c1976 300 $a157 p. ;$c21 cm 490 0 $aNarrativa Sonzogno 500 $aTit. orig.: Rainbows end 700 1 $aRiva, Tilde 907 $a.b10267645$b17-02-17$c27-06-02 912 $a991001750939707536 945 $aLE002 In. IV C 19$g1$i2002000925268$lle002$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i10318914$z27-06-02 996 $aAlla fine dell'arcobaleno$9211804 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale002$b01-01-00$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h0$i1 LEADER 02927nam 2200601 450 001 9910818209103321 005 20220103172150.0 010 $a1-59332-791-9 035 $a(CKB)3710000000259937 035 $a(EBL)1812570 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001349467 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12433421 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001349467 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11398911 035 $a(PQKB)10824723 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1812570 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1812570 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10951594 035 $a(OCoLC)892910424 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000259937 100 $a20141018h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAmerican public religion in Frankfurter and Scalia's opinions /$fDavid C. Meadors 210 1$aEl Paso, Texas :$cLFB Scholarly Publishing LLC,$d2014. 210 4$d©2014 215 $a1 online resource (220 p.) 225 0 $aLaw and Society : Recent Scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-748-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aAmerican public religion in the opinions of Felix Frankfurter and Antonin Scalia -- American public religion and ceremonial deism -- Felix Frankfurter and American public religion -- American public religion : Frankfurter's no establishment cases -- American public religion and Antonin Scalia -- Scalia's no establishment opinions -- Frankfurter, Scalia and public religion. 330 $aMeadors demonstrates weaknesses in the originalist methodology for interpreting the religion clauses of the First Amendment. He concludes that even though courts have an important role to play in protecting religious liberty via the First Amendment this protection needs supplementation by robust advocacy among citizens and mediating institutions in the democratic process. His thesis is that Felix Frankfurter and Antonin Scalia found different forms of American public religion constitutional in their religion clause jurisprudences. Both applied originalist methodology in their religion clause o 410 0$aLaw and Society 606 $aChurch and state$zUnited States$vCases 606 $aReligious observances on public property$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States$vCases 606 $aReligious law and legislation$zUnited States$vCases 610 $aPublic religion 615 0$aChurch and state 615 0$aReligious observances on public property$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aReligious law and legislation 676 $a342.7308/52 700 $aMeadors$b David C.$f1966-$01609767 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910818209103321 996 $aAmerican public religion in Frankfurter and Scalia's opinions$93937164 997 $aUNINA