LEADER 01024nam a22002651i 4500 001 991002420039707536 005 20040314190650.0 008 040407s1967 gw |||||||||||||||||lat 035 $ab12920095-39ule_inst 035 $aARCHE-089970$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Filologia Class. e Scienze Filosofiche$bita$cA.t.i. Arché s.c.r.l. Pandora Sicilia s.r.l. 082 04$a873.01 100 1 $aUsener, Karl Hermann$0486179 245 10$aM. Annaei Lucani Commenta Bernensia /$cedidit Hermannus Usener 260 $aHildesheim :$bOlms,$c1967 300 $aX, 338 p. ;$c22 cm 600 14$aLucano, Marco Anneo$xOpere 700 1 $aLucanus, Marcus Annaeus 740 0 $aCommenta Bernensia 907 $a.b12920095$b02-04-14$c16-04-04 912 $a991002420039707536 945 $aLE007 870.1 Lucanus USE 01.501$g1$i2015000072382$lle007$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i1349241x$z16-04-04 996 $aM. Annaei Lucani Commenta Bernensia$9304850 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale007$b16-04-04$cm$da $e-$flat$ggw $h0$i1 LEADER 00838nam a2200217 i 4500 001 991001738689707536 005 20020507151148.0 008 991021s1995 it ||| | ita 035 $ab11556973-39ule_inst 035 $aLE02724181$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Studi Giuridici$bita 100 1 $aAlbanese, Bernardo$0232874 245 10$aBrevi studi di diritto romano /$cBernardo Albanese 260 $aPalermo :$bJovene,$c1995 500 $aEstr. dal vol. 43 degli "Annali del seminario giuridico dell'università di Palermo" 907 $a.b11556973$b02-04-14$c02-07-02 912 $a991001738689707536 945 $aLE027 ARCHI M 4$g1$iLE027-4529$lle027$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i11758272$z02-07-02 996 $aBrevi studi di diritto romano$9895318 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale027$b01-01-99$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h0$i1 LEADER 04128nam 22006733 450 001 9910377813703321 005 20251017110132.0 010 $a9780813591506 010 $a0813591503 010 $a9780813591513 010 $a0813591511 035 $a(CKB)4100000009835447 035 $a(OAPEN)1007780 035 $a(DE-B1597)541873 035 $a(OCoLC)1143814622 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780813591513 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5975241 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5975241 035 $a(OCoLC)1127952391 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse74920 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/35428 035 $a(oapen)doab35428 035 $a(DNLM)9917429183406676 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000009835447 100 $a20250604d2020 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $auuuuu---auuuu 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPyrrhic progress $ethe history of antibiotics in Anglo-American food production /$fClaas Kirchhelle 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aNew Brunswick :$cRutgers University Press,$d[2020] 210 4$d©2020 215 $a1 online resource (451) 225 1 $aCritical issues in health and medicine 311 08$a9780813591483 311 08$a0813591481 311 08$a9780813591476 311 08$a0813591473 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aThe sound of coughing pigs -- Picking one's poisons : antibiotics and the public -- Chemical cornucopia : antibiotics on the farm -- Toxic priorities : antibiotics and the FDA -- A fusion of concerns : antibiotics and the British public -- Bigger, better, faster : antibiotics and British farming -- Typing resistance : antibiotic regulation in Britain -- The public : antibiotics, failed bans, and growing fears -- The agricultural community : hostility in sinking numbers -- The government : failing to regulate -- Yearning for purity -- British farming and the environmental turn -- Swann song : British antibiotic policy after 1969. 330 $aPyrrhic Progress analyses over half a century of antibiotic use, regulation, and resistance in US and British food production. Mass-introduced after 1945, antibiotics helped revolutionize post-war agriculture. Food producers used antibiotics to prevent and treat disease, protect plants, preserve food, and promote animals' growth. Many soon became dependent on routine antibiotic use to sustain and increase production. The resulting growth of antibiotic infrastructures came at a price. Critics blamed antibiotics for leaving dangerous residues in food, enabling bad animal welfare, and selecting for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria, which could no longer be treated with antibiotics. Pyrrhic Progress reconstructs the complicated negotiations that accompanied this process of risk prioritization between consumers, farmers, and regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Unsurprisingly, solutions differed: while Europeans implemented precautionary antibiotic restrictions to curb AMR, consumer concerns and cost-benefit assessments made US regulators focus on curbing drug residues in food. The result was a growing divergence of antibiotic stewardship and a rise of AMR. Kirchhelle's comprehensive analysis of evolving non-human antibiotic use and the historical complexities of antibiotic stewardship provides important insights for current debates on the global burden of AMR. 410 0$aCritical issues in health and medicine. 606 $aAntibiotics in agriculture$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aAntibiotics in agriculture$zGreat Britain$xHistory 606 $aDrug resistance in microorganisms 615 0$aAntibiotics in agriculture$xHistory. 615 0$aAntibiotics in agriculture$xHistory. 615 0$aDrug resistance in microorganisms. 676 $a615.7/922 700 $aKirchhelle$b Claas$f1987-$01025345 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910377813703321 996 $aPyrrhic Progress$92437857 997 $aUNINA