LEADER 00883nam a2200265 i 4500 001 991003055139707536 005 20020503182852.0 008 990309s1979 it ||| | ita 035 $ab10451948-39ule_inst 035 $aEXGIL114382$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Filol. Ling. e Lett.$bita 082 0 $a410.8 100 1 $aPrandi, Michele$0320331 245 10$aIdee di lingua /$cMichele Prandi 260 $a[Bologna] :$bZanichelli,$c[1979] 300 $a170 p. ;$c19 cm. 490 0 $aBSU 650 4$aFilosofia del linguaggio$xSaggi 650 4$aLinguistica$xSaggi 907 $a.b10451948$b21-02-17$c27-06-02 912 $a991003055139707536 945 $aLE008 L.L.I.D B III 18$g1$i2008000460471$lle008$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i10523960$z27-06-02 996 $aIdee di lingua$9133555 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale008$b01-01-99$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h0$i1 LEADER 01191nam a22002531i 4500 001 991001103249707536 005 20030310195127.0 008 021119s1973 it |||||||||||||||||ita 035 $ab12100328-39ule_inst 035 $aARCHE-019012$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Filologia Ling. e Lett.$bita$cA.t.i. Arché s.c.r.l. Pandora Sicilia s.r.l. 082 04$a792 100 1 $aSpinucci, Pietro$0188649 245 10$aTeatro elisabettiano, teatro di stato :$bla polemica dei puritani inglesi contro il teatro nei sec. 16. e 17. /$cPietro Spinucci 260 $aFirenze :$bOlschki,$c1973 300 $a340 p. :$b5 c. di tav. ;$c22 cm 490 0 $aPubblicazioni dell'Istituto di lingua e letteratura inglese e di letteratura anglo-americana / Università di Genova Facoltà di lettere e filosofia ;$v2 650 4$aTeatro inglese$ySec. 16.-17.$aPolemiche puritane 907 $a.b12100328$b28-04-17$c01-04-03 912 $a991001103249707536 945 $aLE008 FL.M. (IN) B 39$g1$i2008000304881$lle008$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12402448$z01-04-03 996 $aTeatro elisabettiano, teatro di stato$9140326 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale008$b01-04-03$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h0$i1 LEADER 04648nam 22006612 450 001 9910781989203321 005 20151005020622.0 010 $a1-139-12444-7 010 $a1-107-21369-X 010 $a1-283-29592-X 010 $a1-139-12275-4 010 $a9786613295927 010 $a1-139-11701-7 010 $a1-139-11265-1 010 $a0-511-99639-X 010 $a1-139-12767-5 010 $a1-139-11484-0 035 $a(CKB)2550000000055662 035 $a(EBL)775093 035 $a(OCoLC)769341804 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000538254 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11339892 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000538254 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10559695 035 $a(PQKB)11225517 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511996399 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC775093 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL775093 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10502750 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL329592 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000055662 100 $a20110104d2011|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aJudiciaries in comparative perspective /$fedited by H.P. Lee$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2011. 215 $a1 online resource (lvi, 567 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-19060-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tJudicial independence and accountability : core values in liberal democracies /$rShimon Shetreet --$tAppointment, discipline and removal of judges in Australia /$rH.P. Lee --$tAppointment, discipline and removal of judges in Canada /$rMartin L. Friedland --$tAppointment, discipline and removal of judges in New Zealand /$rPhilip A. Joseph --$tAppointment, discipline and removal of judges in South Africa /$rHugh Corder --$tAppointment, discipline and removal of judges : fundamental reforms in the United Kingdom /$rKate Malleson --$tJudicial selection, removal and discipline in the United States /$rMark Tushnet --$tJudges' freedom of speech : Australia /$rJohn M. Williams --$tJudges and free speech in Canada /$rKent Roach --$tJudges and free speech in New Zealand /$rGrant Hammond --$tThe judiciary and freedom of speech in South Africa /$rIain Currie --$tJudges and free speech in the United Kingdom /$rKeith D. Ewing --$tThe criticism and speech of judges in the United States /$rCharles Gardner Geyh --$tJudges, bias and recusal in Australia /$rColin Campbell --$tJudges, bias and recusal in Canada /$rLorne Sossin --$tJudicial recusal in New Zealand /$rGerard McCoy --$tJudges, bias and recusal in South Africa /$rKate O'Regan, Edwin Cameron --$tJudges, bias and recusal in the United Kingdom /$rChristopher Forsyth --$tBias, the appearance of bias, and judicial disqualification in the United States /$rW. William Hodes --$tJudges and non-judicial functions in Australia /$rPatrick Emerton, H.P. Lee --$tThe impact of extra-judicial service on the Canadian judiciary : the need for reform /$rPatrick Monahan, Byron Shaw --$tJudges and the non-judicial function in New Zealand /$rGeoffrey Palmer --$tJudges and non-judicial functions in South Africa /$rCora Hoexter --$tJudges and non-judicial functions in the United Kingdom /$rAbimbola A. Olowofoyeku --$tJudges and non-judicial functions in the United States /$rJeffrey M. Shaman --$tThe judiciary : a comparative conspectus /$rH.P. Lee. 330 $aAn independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative 2011 study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles. 606 $aJudges 606 $aComparative law 615 0$aJudges. 615 0$aComparative law. 676 $a347/.014 686 $aLAW016000$2bisacsh 702 $aLee$b H. P.$f1947- 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910781989203321 996 $aJudiciaries in comparative perspective$91558752 997 $aUNINA