LEADER 05579nam 2200673 450 001 9910816792403321 005 20230803221259.0 010 $a90-272-7020-1 035 $a(CKB)2550000001280555 035 $a(EBL)1682183 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001194026 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12554084 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001194026 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11148052 035 $a(PQKB)11208991 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1682183 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1682183 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10866746 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL601839 035 $a(OCoLC)878919841 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001280555 100 $a20140516h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe functional perspective on language and discourse $eapplications and implications /$fedited by Mari?a de los A?ngeles Go?mez Gonza?lez [and three others] 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (300 p.) 225 1 $aPragmatics & Beyond New Series ;$vVolume 247 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-5652-7 311 $a1-306-70588-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes. 327 $aThe Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Contributors; On the relatedness of functionalism and pragmatics; 1. Preliminary remarks; 2. Pragmatics and functionalism; 3. Chris Butler's contributions to functionalism and pragmatics; 4. The contributions in this volume; References; Part I. Methods in the analysis of language and discourse; Developing comprehensive criteria of adequacy: The challenge of hybridity; 1. Introduction; 2.1 Butler's desiderata explored; 2. In pursuit of a comprehensive model of everything 327 $a2.2 Conceptualising the enterprise3. Hybridity; 3.1 Incompatible part-systems; 3.2 Accommodating hybridity in language; 4. Building a picture of hybridity in language; 4.1 Indeterminacy; 4.2 Bricolage: The diachronic origins of (some) hybridity; 4.3 Managing hybridity; 5. Hybridity and its consequences for linguistic modelling; 5.1 Hybridity in typologies: Sociocultural and cognitive influences; 5.2 The perpetuation of hybridity through acquisition and cognition; 6. Conclusion; References; A method of analysing recontextualisation in the communication of science; 1. Introduction 327 $a2. Recontextualisation2.1 Approach to analysis; 2.2 Analysis of recontextualisation; 3. Resemiotisation; 3.1 Approach to analysis; 3.2 Analysis of resemiotisation; 4. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; Corpus; References; Contrastive corpus annotation in the CONTRANOT project: Issues and problems; 1. Introduction; 2. Background issues: The CONTRANOT project; 3. Contrastive annotation of thematisation; 4. Contrastive annotation of modality features; 5. Evaluation of the annotations; 6. Summary and concluding remarks; References; Appendix 1; Definition of Thematic Field (English) 327 $aEnglish Core Tagset for Theme categories (Declarative clauses)Extended Tagset for English (Thematic Head Types); Appendix 2; Definition of Thematic Field (Spanish); Spanish Core Tagset for Theme categories (Declarative clauses); Extended Tagset for Spanish (Thematic Head Types); Appendix 3; Definition of Modality; Core Tagset for Modality categories; Form and function in evaluative language: The use of corpora to identify contextual valence shifters; 1. Introduction; 2. Linguistic approaches to the study of evaluation 327 $a2.1 Evaluating evaluation terms: Attitude, affect, stance, appraisal and evaluation2.2 Corpus approaches to evaluation: Grammar patterns and local grammars; 3. Computational approaches to sentiment analysis; 4. Sentitext: A sentiment analysis system for Spanish; 4.1 Lexical resources; 4.2 Global sentiment value; 5. Context rules and contextual valence shifters: The use of corpora to identify and modulate valence assignment in text; 6. Conclusion; References; Life before Nation: Bibliometrics and L2 vocabulary studies in 1982; 1. Introduction; 2. The 1982 data; 3. The 2006 data 327 $a4. The changes 1982-2006 330 $aThis article presents the results of a study carried out with Spanish Universitystudents on their use of strategies of (in)directness when expressing complaints,disapprovals and disagreements in English and Spanish. We adopt a role-playeliciting procedure for the collection of what a speaker thinks and what s/heactually says in a given situation. Our results show a tendency to mitigate theactual words uttered with regard to the thought processes in both languages.However, while in English students show a preference for conventional indirectness,in Spanish there is a greater variation in the st 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond new series ;$vVolume 247. 606 $aDiscourse analysis 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aFunctionalism (Linguistics) 615 0$aDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aFunctionalism (Linguistics) 676 $a401/.41 702 $aGo?mez Gonza?lez$b Mari?a de los A?ngeles 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816792403321 996 $aThe functional perspective on language and discourse$94100278 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01459nam 2200337 450 001 996627972503316 005 20250725121809.0 010 $a978-88-6809-415-7 100 $a20241121d2024----km y0itay5003 ba 101 2 $aita$alat 102 $aIT 105 $aa 00 y 200 1 $a<> documenti originali dei principi longobardi di Benevento, Capua e Salerno$dDiplomata principum Beneventi, Capuae et Salerni de gente Langobardorum$fraccolti e pubblicati in facsimile a cura di Franco Bartoloni. Fascicolo 1, (Archivio paleografico italiano, volume 15., fascicolo 62) 205 $aRistampa anastatica della prima ed. 210 $aSpoleto$cFondazione Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo$d2024 215 $d55 cm$a1 cartella ([19] carte di cui 17 ripiegate)$cill. 225 2 $aArgomenti$v1 300 $aRiproduzione dell'edizione: Roma, 1956 300 $aSulla cartella: Centro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo, Spoleto 410 0$aArgomenti$v1 606 0 $2BNCF$aLongobardi$yBenevento [e] Capua [e] Salerno$zSec. 9.-11.$xFonti documentarie 676 $a945.723102 702 1$aBARTOLONI,$bFranco 712 02$aCentro italiano di studi sull'alto Medioevo 801 0$aIT$bcba$gREICAT 912 $a996627972503316 951 $aX.1.A. 229$b291742 L.M.$cX.1.A.$d570150 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 996 $aDocumenti originali dei principi longobardi di Benevento, Capua e Salerno$94405679 997 $aUNISA