LEADER 02283nlm 2200301 a 450 001 996590469003316 005 20240430104429.0 010 $a9780520923720$b(ebook) 100 $a19990722d2000---- uy 0 101 0 $aeng 102 $aUS 135 $adrcnu 200 1 $aImperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman empire$fClifford Ando 210 1 $aBerkeley$cUniversity of California Press$d2000 215 $aTesto elettronico (PDF) (XXI, 494 p.) 225 2 $aClassics and contemporary thought$v6 230 $aBase dati testuale 330 $aL'impero romano rimane unico. Sebbene Roma affermasse di governare il mondo, non lo fece. Piuttosto, la sua unicità deriva dalla cultura che ha creato e dalla lealtà che ha ispirato in un?area che si estendeva dal Tyne all?Eufrate. Inoltre, l?impero creò questa cultura con una burocrazia più piccola di quella di una tipica università di ricerca della fine del XX secolo. Nell?affrontare questo problema, Clifford Ando non pone la domanda sempre di moda: perché l?impero romano cadde? Piuttosto, si chiede: perché l?impero durò così a lungo? L'ideologia imperiale e la lealtà provinciale nell'impero romano sostengono che la longevità dell'impero non si basava sulla potenza militare romana ma su un consenso gradualmente realizzato sulla giustificazione del dominio romano. Questo consenso è stato esso stesso il prodotto di una complessa conversazione tra il governo centrale e le sue remote periferie. Ando indaga i meccanismi che hanno sostenuto questa conversazione, esplora il suo contributo alla legittimazione del potere romano e rivela come suo prodotto l?assorbimento provinciale delle forme e dei contenuti del discorso politico e giuridico romano. In tutto il suo lavoro, la sua lettura sofisticata e sottile è informata dal pensiero attuale sulla formazione sociale di teorici come Max Weber, Jürgen Habermas e Pierre Bourdieu. 410 0$aClassics and contemporary thought$v6. 606 0 $aImpero romano$2BNCF 676 $a937.06 700 1$aANDO,$bClifford$f1969-$0255633 801 0$aIT$bcba$cREICAT 912 $a996590469003316 959 $aEB 969 $aER 996 $aImperial ideology and provincial loyalty in the Roman empire$9701255 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04598nam 22008292 450 001 9910966125403321 005 20151005020623.0 010 $a1-107-14822-7 010 $a1-280-45795-3 010 $a0-511-18586-3 010 $a0-511-18503-0 010 $a0-511-18770-X 010 $a0-511-31374-8 010 $a0-511-48358-9 010 $a0-511-18677-0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000353256 035 $a(EBL)256697 035 $a(OCoLC)489558665 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000140860 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11132266 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000140860 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10055339 035 $a(PQKB)10900099 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511483585 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC256697 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL256697 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10124724 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL45795 035 $a(OCoLC)935231234 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000353256 100 $a20090224d2004|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDomesticity and dissent in the seventeenth-century $eEnglish women writers and the public sphere /$fKatharine Gillespie 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2004. 215 $a1 online resource (xii, 272 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 08$a0-521-12022-5 311 08$a0-521-83063-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aSabrina versus the state -- "Born of the mother's seed" : liberalism, feminism, and religious separatism -- A hammer in her hand : Katherine Chidley and Anna Trapnel separate church from state -- Cure for a diseased head : divorce and contract in the prophesies of Elizabeth Poole -- The unquenchable smoking flax : Sarah Wight, Anne Wentworth, and the "rise" of the sovereign individual -- Improving God's estate : pastoral servitude and the free market in the writings of Mary Cary. 330 $aIn Domesticity and Dissent Katharine Gillespie examines writings by seventeenth-century English Puritan women who fought for religious freedom. Seeking the right to preach and prophesy, women such as Katherine Chidley, Anna Trapnel, Elizabeth Poole, and Anne Wentworth envisioned the modern political principles of toleration, the separation of Church from state, privacy, and individualism. Gillespie argues that their sermons, prophesies, and petitions illustrate the fact that these liberal theories did not originate only with such well-known male thinkers as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Rather, they emerged also from a group of determined female religious dissenters who used the Bible to reassess traditional definitions of womanhood, public speech and religious and political authority. Gillespie takes the 'pamphlet literatures' of the seventeenth century as important subjects for analysis, and her study contributes to the important scholarship on the revolutionary writings that emerged during the volatile years of the mid-seventeenth-century Civil War in England. 517 3 $aDomesticity & Dissent in the Seventeenth Century 606 $aEnglish literature$yEarly modern, 1500-1700$xHistory and criticism 606 $aLiterature and history$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aEnglish literature$xPuritan authors$xHistory and criticism 606 $aEnglish literature$xWomen authors$xHistory and criticism 606 $aDissenters, Religious$zEngland$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aWomen and literature$zEngland$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aPuritan women$zEngland$xIntellectual life 606 $aDissenters, Religious, in literature 607 $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yCivil War, 1642-1649$xLiterature and the war 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aLiterature and history$xHistory 615 0$aEnglish literature$xPuritan authors$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aEnglish literature$xWomen authors$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aDissenters, Religious$xHistory 615 0$aWomen and literature$xHistory 615 0$aPuritan women$xIntellectual life. 615 0$aDissenters, Religious, in literature. 676 $a820.9/358 700 $aGillespie$b Katharine$0561995 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910966125403321 996 $aDomesticity and dissent in the seventeenth century$9941501 997 $aUNINA