LEADER 03736nam 2200709 a 450 001 996588069303316 005 20240516125114.0 010 $a0-8147-6352-9 010 $a0-585-42511-6 024 7 $a10.18574/9780814763520 035 $a(CKB)111056486727292 035 $a(EBL)865749 035 $a(OCoLC)782878016 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000236286 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11219227 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000236286 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10173321 035 $a(PQKB)10255919 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC865749 035 $a(OCoLC)50745272 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse10553 035 $a(DE-B1597)547592 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780814763520 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL865749 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10032493 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111056486727292 100 $a19971203d1998 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 12$aA republic of men $ethe American founders, gendered language, and patriarchal politics /$fMark E. Kann 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aNew York :$cNew York University Press,$d1998. 215 $a1 online resource (x, 238 pages) 311 0 $a0-8147-4714-0 311 0 $a0-8147-4713-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 219-229) and index. 327 $aThe culture of manhood -- The grammar of manhood -- The bachelor and other disorderly men -- The family man and citizenship -- The better sort and leadership -- The heroic man and national destiny -- The founders' gendered legacy. 330 $aWhat role did manhood play in early American Politics? In A Republic of Men, Mark E. Kann argues that the American founders aspired to create a "republic of men" but feared that "disorderly men" threatened its birth, health, and longevity. Kann demonstrates how hegemonic norms of manhood?exemplified by "the Family Man," for instance--were deployed as a means of stigmatizing unworthy men, rewarding responsible men with citizenship, and empowering exceptional men with positions of leadership and authority, while excluding women from public life. Kann suggests that the founders committed themselves in theory to the democratic proposition that all men were created free and equal and could not be governed without their own consent, but that they in no way believed that "all men" could be trusted with equal liberty, equal citizenship, or equal authority. The founders developed a "grammar of manhood" to address some difficult questions about public order. Were America's disorderly men qualified for citizenship? Were they likely to recognize manly leaders, consent to their authority, and defer to their wisdom? A Republic of Men compellingly analyzes the ways in which the founders used a rhetoric of manhood to stabilize American politics. 606 $aPolitical culture$zUnited States$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aPolitical science$zUnited States$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aMen$zUnited States$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aPatriarchy$zUnited States$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aSex role$zUnited States$xHistory$y18th century 606 $aSocial role$zUnited States$xHistory$y18th century 615 0$aPolitical culture$xHistory 615 0$aPolitical science$xHistory 615 0$aMen$xHistory 615 0$aPatriarchy$xHistory 615 0$aSex role$xHistory 615 0$aSocial role$xHistory 676 $a305.32/0973/09033 700 $aKann$b Mark E$01035673 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996588069303316 996 $aA republic of men$92481773 997 $aUNISA