LEADER 01875nam  2200337   450 
001 996577923503316
005 20231215135918.0
010   $a1-5044-8682-X
035   $a(CKB)4100000012875324
035   $a(NjHacI)994100000012875324
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000012875324
100   $a20231215d2022      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aIEEE SA 3D Body Processing Industry Connections $eComparative Analysis of Anthropometric Methods: Past, Present, and Future /$fIEEE
210  1$aNew York, N.Y. :$cIEEE,$d2022.
215   $a1 online resource (52 pages)
330   $aThe 3DBP IC's Quality subgroup focuses on developing preliminary methods, tools, benchmarks, resources, and testing procedures to define and quantify the quality of 3D models as well as the quality of the critical metadata, such as body landmarks and measurements. To further this goal, the 3DBP IC Group completed a comparative analysis of anthropometric methods focused on body measurements and captured 3D body shapes. The aim of this study is twofold: first, to propose a methodology to assess the compatibility and repeatability of different body measurement extraction methods (e.g., body scanners, smartphone apps, and traditional anthropometry) using consistent criteria, and second, to conduct data collection and the corresponding analyses for the first instance of the application of the proposed methodology.
517   $aWhite Paper - Comparative Analysis of Anthropometric Methods
606   $aAnthropometry$vCongresses
615  0$aAnthropometry
676   $a573.6
801  0$bNjHacI
801  1$bNjHacl
906   $aDOCUMENT
912   $a996577923503316
996   $aIEEE SA 3D Body Processing Industry Connections$93884074
997   $aUNISA