LEADER 03801nam 22005173 450 001 996556967603316 005 20231115084558.0 010 $a3-11-107272-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9783111072722 035 $a(CKB)28742951600041 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC30883063 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL30883063 035 $a(DE-B1597)641291 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783111072722 035 $a(EXLCZ)9928742951600041 100 $a20231115d2023 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aKnowledge Shaping $eStudent Note-Taking Practices in Early Modernity 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aBerlin/Boston :$cWalter de Gruyter GmbH,$d2023. 210 4$d©2023. 215 $a1 online resource (264 pages) 225 1 $aRenaissance Mind Series ;$vv.1 311 08$a9783111072609 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tTable of Contents -- $tThe Student?s Mind and His Notes: A Preface -- $tFirst Part: Note-Taking and the Study Discipline -- $tNote-Taking with Method: Remarks on the Theories of Knowledge in Early Modern De ratione studii Manuals -- $tCopia and Historical Note-Taking in an Academic Environment: The Scholarly Manuscripts of the Hungarian Historiographer Péter Révay -- $tAristotle Excerpted and Disput[at]ed: Leiden 1602?1603 -- $tWhat Student Agency at the Academy of Zamo??? Remarks on Some Political Oratory Texts -- $t?Put it in your mind or in the notes?: Instructions for Taking Notes in Early Modern Law Studies -- $tSecond Part: Students? Curiosity and Choices -- $tAristotle Up-Front: A Student?s Notes on the Title Page of Jacques Lefèvre d?Étaple?s Introduction to Aristotle?s Ethics -- $tThe Notebook that Stood Trial for Heresy: Antitrinitarianism among Polish Students in Tübingen in 1550s -- $tTransmission and Transformation of Knowledge: Valentine Nádasdi?s Miscellany from the University of Paris or the Chances of Christian Kabbalah and Neoplatonism on the Ottoman Frontier -- $tIndex of Names 330 $aHow can we portray the history of Renaissance knowledge production through the eyes of the students? Their university notebooks contained a variety of works, fragments of them, sentences, or simple words. To date, studies on these materials have only concentrated on a few individual works within the collections, neglecting the strategy by which texts and textual fragments were selected and the logic through which the notebooks were organized. The eight chapters that make up this volume explore students' note-taking practices behind the creation of their notebooks from three different angles. The first considers annotation activities in relation to their study area to answer the question of how university disciplines were able to influence both the content and structure of their notebooks. The volume's second area of research focuses on the student's curiosity and choices by considering them expressions of a self-learning practice not necessarily linked to a discipline of study or instructions from teaching. The last part of the volume moves away from the student?s desk to consider instructions on note-taking methods that students could receive from manuals of various kinds. 410 0$aRenaissance Mind Series 606 $aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern$2bisacsh 610 $alearning. 610 $amanuscripts. 610 $anotebook. 610 $auniversity. 615 7$aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern. 676 $a378.170903 700 $aLepri$b Valentina$01154548 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996556967603316 996 $aKnowledge Shaping$93590182 997 $aUNISA