LEADER 02401nam  2200577   450 
001 996552866403316
005 20231124210455.0
010   $a3-7489-3895-0
035   $a(CKB)5590000001267408
035   $a(NjHacI)995590000001267408
035   $a(EXLCZ)995590000001267408
100   $a20231124d2023      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aImpact of Strategies on the Vote Share of New Parties /$fMartin Rachuj
210  1$aBaden-Baden :$cNomos,$d2023.
215   $a1 online resource (225 pages)
225 0 $aComparative politics, Volume 13 ;$vBand 82
311   $a3-7560-0594-1 
330   $aCan established parties influence the electoral success of new parties? To answer this research question, the author examined the relationships of 168 new parties in 18 highly developed democracies with their established competitors based on their respective election programmes and election results. His analysis of the textual similarity of these election manifestos shows that established parties can influence their competitors' election results by selectively changing the emphasis of their policies. However, competition among the parties must also be taken into account. This study thus contributes to a better understanding of the dynamics of party competition and the opportunities offered by computer-assisted textual analysis in the social sciences.
606   $aParty System
606   $aParty competition
606   $aPolitical Parties
606   $aSimulation
606   $aSpatial Theory
606   $aelection programs
606   $aelectoral success
606   $aengagement strategy
606   $aestablished parties
606   $asalience theory
615  0$aParty System.
615  0$aParty competition.
615  0$aPolitical Parties.
615  0$aSimulation.
615  0$aSpatial Theory.
615  0$aelection programs.
615  0$aelectoral success.
615  0$aengagement strategy.
615  0$aestablished parties.
615  0$asalience theory.
676   $a324.2
700   $aRachuj$b Martin$01439935
801  0$bNjHacI
801  1$bNjHacl
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996552866403316
996   $aImpact of Strategies on the Vote Share of New Parties$93602279
997   $aUNISA