LEADER 03839nam 2200541 450 001 996492065903316 005 20231128210029.0 010 $a3-11-076808-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110768084 035 $a(CKB)5690000000033075 035 $a(NjHacI)995690000000033075 035 $a(DE-B1597)602143 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110768084 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7090707 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7090707 035 $a(OCoLC)1346260547 035 $a(EXLCZ)995690000000033075 100 $a20221122d2022 uy 0 101 0 $alat 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAmicus Lucretius $eGassendi, il De rerum natura e l'edonismo cristiano /$fEnrico Piergiacomi 210 1$aBerlin, Germany :$cDe Gruyter,$d2022. 215 $a1 online resource (i. 459 pages) 225 1 $aCICERO ;$vVolume 5 311 $a3-11-076721-X 327 $tFrontmatter --$tPremessa --$tSommario --$tIntroduzione --$t1 L?analisi di Epicuro e Lucrezio prima di Gassendi --$t2 Lucrezio il poeta-filosofo secondo Gassendi --$t3 Un atomismo provvidenziale. La fisica di Gassendi --$t4 Lucrezio e Gassendi sulla natura dell?anima --$t5 Dio crea il piacere. Per un «edonismo cristiano --$tConclusioni: Amicus Lucretius, sed magis amicus Christus --$tAppendice: Inventario delle citazioni da Lucrezio in Gassendi (Totale: 6249 su 7415 versi = 84,28%) --$tAbbreviazioni --$tBibliografia --$tIndice delle citazioni da Lucrezio --$tIndice delle citazioni da Gassendi --$tIndice da altre fonti antiche e moderne --$tIndice dei nomi 330 $aMany scholars have studied the dialogue between the Epicurean tradition and Pierre Gassendi. However, no one so far has ever attempted to conduct a full analysis of the latter?s specific reception of Lucretius. The book attempts to show that Gassendi was the first to discuss almost the whole De rerum natura, as part of an ambitious project. He sought to provide a Christianized version of Lucretius? theory or to develop an atomistic worldview ?freed? from the many dangerous errors that were often imputed to atomism (impiety, debauchery, and irrationality). In particular, Gassendi developed a dialectical strategy that led him to recover a providential atomism, an Epicurean psychology that saves the immortality of the soul, and a Christian hedonism from the De rerum natura. The last goal was especially important. Gassendi here emerges as the culmination of a tradition of Christian philosophers, like Lorenzo Valla and Erasmus of Rotterdam, who have tried to merge Epicurean hedonism with the Christian religion. The volume could therefore attract both scholars of Antiquity and Renaissance/modern philosophy. It is also a rewarding reading for scholars of the reception of Latin poetry from a philosophical perspective. 330 $aThe book provides the first systematic reconstruction of the reception of Lucretius? theological and ethical verses in the work of the early modern philosopher Pierre Gassendi (1592?1655). It argues that the latter was the first to "e and discuss almost the entire De rerum natura, intending to develop a modified version of Epicurean philosophy, compatible with the new science and the religious/ethical demands of Christianity. 410 0$aCICERO ;$vVolume 5. 517 $a?Amicus Lucretius? 517 $aAmicus Lucretius 606 $aChristianity 610 $aAtomistic theology. 610 $aChristian Hedonism. 610 $aLucretius. 610 $aPierre Gassendi. 615 0$aChristianity. 676 $a230 700 $aPiergiacomi$b Enrico$01265193 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996492065903316 996 $aAmicus Lucretius$92967051 997 $aUNISA