LEADER 04058nam 22006015 450 001 996475752303316 005 20231110225015.0 010 $a3-11-077100-4 035 $a(CKB)5860000000041473 035 $a(DE-B1597)612081 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110771008 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7015442 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7015442 035 $a(OCoLC)1322126224 035 $a(EXLCZ)995860000000041473 100 $a20220524h20222022 fg 101 0 $ager 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 04$aDie DDR-Literatur und die Wissenschaften /$fhrsg. von Angela Gencarelli 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston : $cDe Gruyter, $d[2022] 210 4$d©2022 215 $a1 online resource (VII, 300 p.) 225 0 $aStudien und Texte zur Sozialgeschichte der Literatur ,$x0174-4410 ;$v158 311 $a3-11-077074-1 330 $aDas Verhältnis zwischen Literatur und Wissen(schaft) wird seit Jahrzehnten rege beforscht, allerdings wurde die DDR-Literatur dabei fast völlig außen vor gelassen. So blieb unentdeckt, dass die ?Produktivkraft Wissenschaft? zu einem ihrer wichtigsten Gegenstände avancierte. Das Verhältnis der DDR-Autor*innen zur gesellschaftlich zentralen, ja revolutionären ?Produktivkraft?, wie es offiziell hieß, stand von Beginn an unter ambivalenten Vorzeichen: Einerseits galt die Schlüsselrolle von Wissenschaft und Technik als verbindlich, und kulturpolitische Direktiven verfolgten das Ziel, die Literaturproduzent*innen eng(er) an die Wissenschaften zu binden. Andererseits entdeckten die Schriftsteller*innen die Wissenschaften durchaus auch aus eigenem Interesse heraus und erfüllten die offiziellen Schreibaufträge auf ihre eigene, mitunter eigenwillige Weise. In diesem Spannungsfeld bewegen sich die einzelnen Fallstudien, die den literarischen Aneignungsweisen der Wissenschaften bei Schriftsteller*innen wie Sarah Kirsch, Franz Fühmann, Johannes R. Becher, Dieter Noll, Brigitte Reimann, Maxie Wander, Christa Wolf, Hildegard Maria Rauchfuß, Christoph Hein, Fritz Rudolf Fries, Helga Königsdorf und Heiner Müller gewidmet sind. 330 $aWhat is the relationship between literature and the sciences? What scientific insights has it adopted and which knowledge has it produced in the process? These are the kinds of research questions that this volume is the first to discuss in relation to the previously neglected field of GDR literature, which had a productive, critical relationship to the societally central "productive power of science," which was seen as "revolutionary." 410 0$aStudien und Texte Zur Sozialgeschichte der Literatur 606 $aLITERARY CRITICISM / European / General$2bisacsh 610 $aCulture of science. 610 $aGermany (GDR). 610 $asciences. 610 $atwentieth century. 615 7$aLITERARY CRITICISM / European / General. 702 $aArnolds$b Marlen, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aBetzler$b Lukas, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aDescher$b Stefan, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aEichhorn$b Kristin, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aGencarelli$b Angela, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aGencarelli$b Angela, $4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aKlocke$b Sonja E., $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aKuberg$b Maria, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aMax$b Katrin, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aMeuer$b Marlene, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 702 $aStopka$b Katja, $4ctb$4https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ctb 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996475752303316 996 $aDie DDR-Literatur und die Wissenschaften$92860336 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04621nam 2201033z- 450 001 9910557629303321 005 20210501 035 $a(CKB)5400000000045121 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69356 035 $a(oapen)doab69356 035 $a(EXLCZ)995400000000045121 100 $a20202105d2020 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aLife Cycle & Technoeconomic Modeling 210 $aBasel, Switzerland$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2020 215 $a1 online resource (208 p.) 311 08$a3-03943-639-2 311 08$a3-03943-640-6 330 $aThis book aims to perform an impartial analysis to evaluate the implications of the environmental costs and impacts of a wide range of technologies and energy strategies. This information is intended to be used to support decision-making by groups, including researchers, industry, regulators, and policy-makers. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and technoeconomic analysis can be applied to a wide variety of technologies and energy strategies, both established and emerging. LCA is a method used to evaluate the possible environmental impacts of a product, material, process, or activity. It assesses the environmental impact throughout the life cycle of a system, from the acquisition of materials to the manufacture, use, and final disposal of a product. Technoeconomic analysis refers to cost evaluations, including production cost and life cycle cost. Often, in order to carry out technoeconomic analysis, researchers are required to obtain data on the performance of new technologies that operate on a very small scale in order to subsequently design configurations on a commercial scale and estimate the costs of such expansions. The results of the developed models help identify possible market applications and provide an estimate of long-term impacts. These methods, together with other forms of decision analysis, are very useful in the development and improvement of energy objectives, since they will serve to compare different decisions, evaluating their political and economic feasibility and providing guidance on potential financial and technological risks. 606 $aHistory of engineering and technology$2bicssc 610 $aallocation 610 $aancillary ventilation 610 $abibliometrics 610 $abottom-up models 610 $abuilding 610 $abuilding archetype simulation 610 $aCalifornia 610 $aCFDs 610 $acost of PV recycling 610 $adiffusion rate 610 $aeco-costs 610 $aeco-efficient value creation 610 $aeconomic-financial viability 610 $aeffective zone 610 $aelectricity scenarios 610 $aend of life of PV 610 $aend-use forecasting 610 $aenergy conservation 610 $aenergy modeling 610 $aenergy simulation 610 $aenergy storage 610 $aenergy transition 610 $aenvironmental costs 610 $aenvironmental impacts 610 $aEROI 610 $aEVC 610 $aEVR 610 $aFRELP 610 $agreen GDP, China 610 $agrid mix 610 $ahourly data 610 $ainstallation and maintenance maneuvers 610 $aItalian electricity 610 $alife cycle assessment 610 $alife cycle assessment (LCA) 610 $alife-cycle costs 610 $alithium-ion battery 610 $amixture model 610 $anet energy analysis 610 $aocean energy 610 $aoffshore renewable energy 610 $aphotovoltaic 610 $aphotovoltaic waste 610 $aradiant cooling system 610 $areview 610 $asensitivity analysis 610 $astreet lighting system 610 $asystem expansion 610 $aTCO 610 $athermal inertia 610 $athermal mass 610 $atidal energy converters 610 $auncertainty analysis 610 $aunit energy consumption 615 7$aHistory of engineering and technology 700 $aColmenar Santos$b Antonio$4edt$0866278 702 $aBorge Diez$b David$4edt 702 $aRosales Asensio$b Enrique$4edt 702 $aColmenar Santos$b Antonio$4oth 702 $aBorge Diez$b David$4oth 702 $aRosales Asensio$b Enrique$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910557629303321 996 $aLife Cycle & Technoeconomic Modeling$93036805 997 $aUNINA