LEADER 04272nam 2200577 450 001 996472041303316 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a3-11-046989-8 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110470215 035 $a(CKB)3710000001123490 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4830570 035 $a(DE-B1597)463085 035 $a(OCoLC)984617004 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110470215 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4830570 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11369156 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL1003097 035 $a(OCoLC)980742600 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001123490 100 $a20170419h20172017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aTranscendental arguments in moral theory /$fedited by Jens Peter Brune, Robert Stern and Micha H. Werner 210 1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2017. 210 4$d?2017 215 $a1 online resource (366 pages) $cillustrations 311 $a3-11-046980-4 311 $a3-11-047021-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tTable of Contents -- $tIntroduction -- $tSilencing the Sceptic? The Prospects for Transcendental Arguments in Practical Philosophy -- $tAmbition, Modesty, and Performative Inconsistency -- $tOn Pain of Self-Contradiction? -- $tClaims as Departure Points for Transcendental Arguments: Understanding Argumentation as a Game -- $tStill Lonely: The Moral Solipsist after Transcendental Argumentation -- $tConstitutivism and Transcendental Practical Philosophy -- $tTranscendental Arguments for a Categorical Imperative as Arguments from Agential Self-Understanding -- $tTranscendental Arguments and Practical Self-Understanding?Gewirthian Perspectives -- $tTranscendental Arguments in Favour of Absolute Values -- $tNeither for Beasts nor for Gods: Why only morally-committed Human Beings can accept Transcendental Arguments -- $tNormative Pragmatics: Approach, Promise, Outlook -- $tSocial Constitutivism and the Role of Retorsive Arguments -- $tTranscendental-Pragmatic Foundation of Ethics. Transcendental Arguments and Ethics -- $tConceptual Pragmatism and Normativity: Clarence Irving Lewis -- $tTranscending Value: Two Readings of Performative Inconsistency -- $tTranscendental Anti-Theodicy -- $tArgumentative Discourse: The Transcendental Starting Point of Apelian Discourse Ethics -- $tNotes on Contributors -- $tIndex 330 $aSince Barry Stroud's classic paper in 1968, the general discussion on transcendental arguments tends to focus on examples from theoretical philosophy. It also tends to be pessimistic, or at least extremely reluctant, about the potential of this kind of arguments. Nevertheless, transcendental reasoning continues to play a prominent role in some recent approaches to moral philosophy. Moreover, some authors argue that transcendental arguments may be more promising in moral philosophy than they are in theoretical contexts. Against this background, the current volume focuses on transcendental arguments in practical philosophy. Experts from different countries and branches of philosophy share their views about whether there are actually differences between ?theoretical? and ?practical? uses of transcendental arguments. They examine and compare different versions of transcendental arguments in moral philosophy, explain their structure, and assess their respective problems and promises. This book offers all those interested in ethics, meta-ethics, or epistemology a more comprehensive understanding of transcendental arguments. It also provides them with new insights into uses of transcendental reasoning in moral philosophy. 606 $aEthics 606 $aTranscendentalism 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEthics. 615 0$aTranscendentalism. 676 $a170 686 $aCC 7200$qBVB$2rvk 702 $aBrune$b Jens Peter 702 $aStern$b Robert 702 $aWerner$b Micha H. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996472041303316 996 $aTranscendental arguments in moral theory$92738165 997 $aUNISA