LEADER 03743nam 2200685 a 450 001 9910462049703321 005 20210114205737.0 010 $a1-283-58218-X 010 $a9786613894632 010 $a0-19-157178-4 035 $a(CKB)2670000000236990 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH24219703 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000736515 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12300289 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000736515 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10772908 035 $a(PQKB)10543669 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000370256 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11276428 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000370256 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10374278 035 $a(PQKB)11211624 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3054846 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000236990 100 $a20110615e20112009 fy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBeyond consequentialism$b[electronic resource] /$fby Paul Hurley 210 $aOxford $cOxford University Press$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (288 p.) 300 $aOriginally published: 2009. 311 $a0-19-969843-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 8 $aHurley sets out a radical challenge to consequentialism, the theory which might seem to be the default option in contemporary moral philosophy. There is an unresolved tension within the theory: if consequentialists are right about the content of morality, then morality cannot have the rational authority that even they take it to have.$bConsequentialism, the theory that morality requires us to promote the best overall outcome, is the default alternative in contemporary moral philosophy, and is highly influential in public discourses beyond academic philosophy. Paul Hurley argues that current discussions of the challenge consequentialism tend to overlook a fundamental challenge to consequentialism. The standard consequentialist account of the content of morality, he argues, cannot be reconciled to theauthoritativeness of moral standards for rational agents. If rational agents typically have decisive reasons to do what morality requires, then consequentialism cannot be the correct account of moral standards. Hurley builds upon this challenge to argue that the consequentialist case for grounding the impartialevaluation of actions in the impartial evaluation of outcomes is built upon a set of subtle and mutually reinforcing mistakes. Through exposing these mistakes and misappropriations, he undermines consequentialist arguments against alternative approaches that recognize a conception of impartiality appropriate to the evaluation of actions which is distinct from the impartiality appropriate to the evaluation of outcomes. A moral theory that recognizes a fundamental role for such a distinctconception of impartiality can account for the rational authority of moral standards, but does so, Hurley argues, by taking morality beyond consequentialism in both its standard and non-standard forms. 606 $aConsequentialism (Ethics) 606 $aPragmatism 606 $aPhilosophy$2ukslc 606 $aPhilosophy$2HILCC 606 $aPhilosophy & Religion$2HILCC 606 $aEthics$2HILCC 608 $aElectronic books.$2lcsh 615 0$aConsequentialism (Ethics) 615 0$aPragmatism. 615 7$aPhilosophy. 615 7$aPhilosophy 615 7$aPhilosophy & Religion 615 7$aEthics 676 $a171.5 700 $aHurley$b Paul$g(Paul E.)$0870565 801 0$bStDuBDS 801 1$bStDuBDS 801 2$bStDuBDSZ 801 2$bUkPrAHLS 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462049703321 996 $aBeyond consequentialism$91943429 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03018nam 2200613 450 001 996466768003316 005 20220304103231.0 010 $a3-540-47388-2 024 7 $a10.1007/BFb0084432 035 $a(CKB)1000000000437073 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000323358 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12042126 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000323358 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10296664 035 $a(PQKB)11221879 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-540-47388-6 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5586053 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5586053 035 $a(OCoLC)1066196574 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6842620 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6842620 035 $a(OCoLC)793079251 035 $a(PPN)155168630 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000437073 100 $a20220304d1991 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aFunctional differential equations with infinite delay /$fYoshiyuki Hino, Satoru Murakami, Toshiki Naito 205 $a1st ed. 1991. 210 1$aBerlin ;$aHeidelberg :$cSpringer-Verlag,$d[1991] 210 4$dİ1991 215 $a1 online resource (X, 318 p.) 225 1 $aLecture Notes in Mathematics ;$v1473 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a3-540-54084-9 327 $aPhase Spaces -- Fundamental theorems -- Stieltjes integrals and linear operators on ? -- General linear systems -- Linear autonomous systems -- Linear periodic systems -- Fading memory spaces and functional differential equations -- Stabilities in perturbed systems and limiting equations -- Existence of periodic solutions and almost periodic solutions. 330 $aIn the theory of functional differential equations with infinite delay, there are several ways to choose the space of initial functions (phase space); and diverse (duplicated) theories arise, according to the choice of phase space. To unify the theories, an axiomatic approach has been taken since the 1960's. This book is intended as a guide for the axiomatic approach to the theory of equations with infinite delay and a culmination of the results obtained in this way. It can also be used as a textbook for a graduate course. The prerequisite knowledge is foundations of analysis including linear algebra and functional analysis. It is hoped that the book will prepare students for further study of this area, and that will serve as a ready reference to the researchers in applied analysis and engineering sciences. 410 0$aLecture notes in mathematics (Springer-Verlag) ;$v1473. 606 $aFunctional equations 615 0$aFunctional equations. 676 $a515.75 700 $aHino$b Yoshiyuki$059918 702 $aMurakami$b Satoru$f1950- 702 $aNaito?$b Toshiki$f1944- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996466768003316 996 $aFunctional differential equations with infinite delay$9262336 997 $aUNISA