LEADER 03411oam 22004574a 450 001 9910493654103321 005 20211004152915.0 010 $a0-253-04952-0 010 $a0-253-04951-2 035 $a(CKB)4100000011262508 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6208472 035 $a(OCoLC)1155708819 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_84606 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011262508 100 $a20200928d2020 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Memory Marketplace$eWitnessing Pain in Contemporary Irish and International Theatre /$fEmilie Pine 210 1$aBloomington, Indiana$cIndiana University Press$d[2020] 210 4$dİ[2020] 215 $a1 online resource (262 pages) 225 0 $aIrish culture, memory, place 300 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 311 $a0-253-04950-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction: The Market for Pain -- Tell Them That You Saw Us: Witnessing Docu-verbatim Memory -- The Witness as Commodity: Autoperforming Memory -- The Commissioned Witness, Theatre, and Truth -- The Immaterial Labor of Listening: Presence, Absence, Failure, and the Commodification of the Witness -- Consumers or Witnesses: Site-Specific Performance -- Conclusion: Activism in the Marketplace. 330 3 $a"What happens when cultural memory becomes a commodity? Who owns the memory? In The Memory Marketplace, Emilie Pine explores how memory is performed both in Ireland and abroad by considering the significant body of contemporary Irish theatre that contends with its own culture and history. Analyzing examples from this realm of theatre, Pine focuses on the idea of witnesses, both as performers on stage and as members of the audience. Whose memories are observed in these transactions, and how and why do performances prioritize some memories over others? What does it mean to create, rehearse, perform, and purchase the theatricalization of memory? The Memory Marketplace shows this transaction to be particularly fraught in the theatricalization of traumatic moments of cultural upheaval, such as the child sexual abuse scandal in Ireland. In these performances, the role of empathy becomes key within the marketplace dynamic, and Pine argues that this empathy shapes the kinds of witnesses created. The complexities and nuances of this exchange-subject and witness, spectator and performer, consumer and commodified-provide a deeper understanding of the crucial role theatre plays in shaping public understanding of trauma, memory, and history". 330 3 $aIntroduction: The Market for Pain -- Tell Them That You Saw Us: Witnessing Docu-verbatim Memory -- The Witness as Commodity: Autoperforming Memory -- The Commissioned Witness, Theatre, and Truth -- The Immaterial Labor of Listening: Presence, Absence, Failure, and the Commodification of the Witness -- Consumers or Witnesses: Site-Specific Performance -- Conclusion: Activism in the Marketplace. 410 0$aIrish culture, memory, and place. 608 $aElectronic books. 676 $a792.09415 700 $aPine$b Emilie$4aut$01052363 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910493654103321 996 $aThe memory marketplace$92483582 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04219nam 22005535 450 001 996455153703316 005 20230929130721.0 010 $a1-4744-8534-0 024 7 $a10.1515/9781474485340 035 $a(CKB)5440000000000051 035 $a(DE-B1597)618314 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781474485340 035 $a(OCoLC)1308954824 035 $a(ScCtBLL)bfe0d4c1-b764-4890-9fb2-a72a2ef703ab 035 $a(EXLCZ)995440000000000051 100 $a20220524h20222022 fg 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDigisprudence $ecode as law rebooted /$fLaurence Diver 210 1$aEdinburgh :$cEdinburgh University Press,$d[2022] 210 4$dİ2022 215 $a1 online resource (276 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aFuture Law : FULA 311 1 $a1-4744-8533-2 311 1 $a1-4744-8532-4 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tExpanded Table of Contents -- $tIllustrations -- $tAcknowledgements -- $t1 Introduction -- $tPart I Computational Legalism and the Rule(s) of Code -- $t2 A Design Perspective: Code is More than Law -- $t3 A Legal Philosophy Perspective: Code is Less than Law -- $tPart II What Makes a Good Rule? -- $t4 Criteria for Laws -- $t5 Criteria for Code -- $tPart III Legitimating Code: Theory and Practice -- $t6 The Digisprudential Affordances -- $t7 Operationalising Digisprudence -- $t8 Rebooting Code as Law: Conclusions and Next Steps -- $tBibliography -- $tIndex 330 8 $aReboots the debate on ?code as law? to present a new cross-disciplinary direction that sheds light on the fundamental issue of software legitimacyReinvigorates the debate at the intersection of legal theory, philosophy of technology, STS and design practice Synthesises theories of legitimate legal rulemaking with practical knowledge of code production tools and practiceProposes a set of affordances that can legitimise code in line with an ecological view of legalityDraws on contemporary technologies as case studies, examining blockchain applications and the Internet of ThingsLaurence Diver combines insight from legal theory, philosophy of technology and programming practice to develop a new theoretical and practical approach to the design of legitimate software. The book critically engages with the rule(s) of code, arguing that, like laws, these should exhibit certain formal characteristics if they are to be acceptable in a democracy. The resulting digisprudential affordances translate ideas of legitimacy from legal philosophy into the world of code design, to be realised through the ?constitutional? role played by programming languages, integrated development environments (IDEs), and agile development practice. The text interweaves theory and practice throughout, including many insights into real-world technologies, as well as case studies on blockchain applications and the Internet of Things (IoT).Whenever you use a smartphone, website, or IoT device, your behaviour is determined to a great extent by a designer. Their software code defines from the outset what is possible, with very little scope to interpret the meaning of those ?rules? or to contest them. How can this kind of control be acceptable in a democracy? If we expect legislators to respect values of legitimacy when they create the legal rules that govern our lives, shouldn?t we expect the same from the designers whose code has a much more direct rule over us? 410 0$aFuture Law 606 $aComputer networks$xLaw and legislation 606 $aComputer programming 606 $aComputer programming$xSocial aspects 606 $aCyberspace$xSocial aspects 606 $aLAW / Jurisprudence$2bisacsh 615 0$aComputer networks$xLaw and legislation. 615 0$aComputer programming 615 0$aComputer programming$xSocial aspects. 615 0$aCyberspace$xSocial aspects. 615 7$aLAW / Jurisprudence. 676 $a343.09/944 700 $aDiver$b Laurence$00 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996455153703316 996 $aDigisprudence$93561233 997 $aUNISA